Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31890347›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2019

Nonlinear Optical Corneal Crosslinking, Mechanical Stiffening, and Corneal Flattening Using Amplified Femtosecond Pulses.

Samantha Bradford, Eric Mikula, Sun Woong Kim, Yilu Xie, Tibor Juhasz, Donald J Brown, James V Jester

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Corneal Crosslinking in Refractive Corrections.Translational vision science & technology · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of keratoconus.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Samantha BradfordUniversity of California, Irvine, Department of Ophthalmology and Biomedical Engineering, Irvine, CA, USA.
Eric MikulaUniversity of California, Irvine, Department of Ophthalmology and Biomedical Engineering, Irvine, CA, USA.
Sun Woong KimUniversity of California, Irvine, Department of Ophthalmology and Biomedical Engineering, Irvine, CA, USA.
Yilu XieUniversity of California, Irvine, Department of Ophthalmology and Biomedical Engineering, Irvine, CA, USA.
Tibor JuhaszUniversity of California, Irvine, Department of Ophthalmology and Biomedical Engineering, Irvine, CA, USA.
Donald J BrownUniversity of California, Irvine, Department of Ophthalmology and Biomedical Engineering, Irvine, CA, USA.
James V JesterUniversity of California, Irvine, Department of Ophthalmology and Biomedical Engineering, Irvine, CA, USA.
University of California, Irvine · USYonsei University · KR

Funding

Non-linear Optical Collagen Cross-linking (NLO CXL) for Treatment of Keratoconus.R01EY024600 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI JESTER, JAMES V · 2014 to 2024
$3.1M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe have shown that nonlinear optical corneal crosslinking (NLO CXL) and stiffening can be achieved in ex vivo rabbit corneas using an 80-MHz, 760-nm femtosecond (FS) laser, however the required power was beyond the American National Standard Institute limit. The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of amplified FS pulses to perform CXL to reduce power by increasing pulse energy.

methodsA variable numerical aperture laser scanning delivery system was coupled to a 1030-nm laser with a noncollinear optical parametric amplifier to generate 760 nm, 50 to 150 kHz amplified FS pulses with 79.5-μm axial and 2.9-μm lateral two-photon focal volume. Ex vivo rabbit corneas received NLO CXL, and effectiveness was assessed by measuring collagen autofluorescence (CAF) and mechanical stiffening. NLO CXL was also performed in 14 live rabbits, and changes in corneal topography were measured using an Orbscan.

resultsAmplified pulses (0.3 μJ) generated significant CAF that increased logarithmically with decreasing scan speed; achieving equivalent CAF to UVA CXL at 15.5 mm/s. Indentation testing detected a 62% increase in stiffness compared to control, and corneal topography measurements revealed a significant decrease of 1.0 ± 0.8 diopter by 1 month (

conclusionsThese results show that NLO CXL using amplified pulses can produce corneal collagen CXL comparable to UVA CXL. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: NLO CXL using amplified pulses can produce corneal CXL comparable to UVA CXL, suggesting a potential clinical application in which NLO CXL can be used to perform personalized crosslinking for treatment of refractive errors and keratoconus.

Indexed as

corneacrosslinkingfemtosecond laserkeratoconusmyopianonlinear

Identifiers

PMID31890347
PMCPMC6917096
OpenAlexW2995008063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.