Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31890327›Full record

ArticleSafety and health at work2019

Occupational Exposure to Potentially Infectious Biological Material Among Physicians, Dentists, and Nurses at a University.

Leonardo Amaral Reis, Ehideé Isabel Gómez La-Rotta, Priscilla Barbosa Diniz, Francisco Hideo Aoki, Jacks Jorge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Safety and health at work, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leonardo Amaral ReisFaculty of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Ehideé Isabel Gómez La-RottaMedical Sciences College, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Priscilla Barbosa DinizFaculty of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Francisco Hideo AokiMedical Sciences College, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Jacks JorgeFaculty of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and incidence of accidents with biological material, the level of knowledge, and compliance to standard precautions (SPs) among dentists, physicians, nurses, and dental and medical students.

methodsA closed cohort study with a prospective and retrospective component was conducted between August 2014 and September 2015. The participants were contacted in two moments during the follow-up period, during which a structured questionnaire divided into six sections was used; the interviews were conducted during the follow-up period (Month 6) and at the end of the observation period (Month 12).

resultsThe global prevalence of accidents in the previous 12 months was 10.2%, with a difference between professionals and students (13.0% vs. 5.1%, respectively;

conclusionWe conclude that the proportion/incidence rate of accidents with biological material was high in relation to that in the literature, being higher in professionals and especially among physicians. The levels of knowledge and adherence to SP were good, with the best found in dentists and dental students.

Indexed as

Accidents at workCompliance to standard precautionsIncidenceNeedle stick injuriesPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID31890327
PMCPMC6933159
OpenAlexW2966376162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.