ArticleSafety and health at work2019
Risk Assessment for Metalworking Fluids and Respiratory Outcomes.
Article in Safety and health at work, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Twenty-Year Longitudinal Cohort Study of Cancer Incidence and Mortality Among Workers in Two Primary Aluminum Prebake Smelters.American journal of industrial medicine · 2026Article
- Risk assessment methods in occupational health and hygiene: a scoping review.Annals of work exposures and health · 2025Article
- Characterization of occupational inhalation exposures to particulate and gaseous straight and water-based metalworking fluids.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The influence of ventilation modes on oil mist particles diffusion in a machining workshop.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Analysis of a Vegetable Oil Performance in a Milling Process by MQL Lubrication.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Letter to the Editor Regarding "Risk Assessment for Toluene Diisocyanate and Respiratory Disease Human Studies".Safety and health at work · 2022Article
- Author's Response to Letters to the Editor regarding "Risk Assessment for Toluene Diisocyanate and Respiratory Disease Human Studies".Safety and health at work · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetalworking fluids (MWFs) are mixtures with inhalation exposures as mists, dusts, and vapors, and dermal exposure in the dispersed and bulk liquid phase. A quantitative risk assessment was performed for exposure to MWF and respiratory disease.
methodsRisks associated with MWF were derived from published studies and NIOSH
resultsA strong healthy worker survivor effect was present. New-onset asthma and hypersensitivity pneumonitis, at 0.1 mg/m
conclusionSignificant risks of impairment and chronic disease occurred at 0.1 mg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.