Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31890324›Full record

ArticleSafety and health at work2019

Prevention of Occupational Diseases in Turkey: Deriving Lessons From Journey of Surveillance.

Seyhan Şen, Gülşen Barlas, Selçuk Yakıştıran, İlknur G Derin, Berna A Şerifi, Ahmet Özlü, Lutgart Braeckman, Gert van der Laan, Frank van Dijk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Safety and health at work, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Seyhan ŞenCoordination Unit for Multisectoral Health Responsibility Program, General Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Ankara, Turkey.
Gülşen BarlasDepartment of Health Threats, Early Warning and Response, General Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Ankara, Turkey.
Selçuk YakıştıranProvincial Health Directorate, Occupational Health Unit, Ankara, Turkey.
İlknur G DerinProvincial Health Directorate, Bursa, Turkey.
Berna A ŞerifiProvincial Health Directorate, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Ahmet ÖzlüOccupational Health Department, General Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Ankara, Turkey.
Lutgart BraeckmanDepartment of Public Health, Ghent University, Belgium.
Gert van der LaanDepartment of Public Health, Free University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Frank van DijkDepartment of Public Health, Free University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ministry of Health · TRUniversity of Amsterdam · NLGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo prevent and manage the societal and economic burden of occupational diseases (ODs), countries should develop strong prevention policies, health surveillance and registry systems. This study aims to contribute to the improvement of OD surveillance at national level as well as to identify priority actions in Turkey.

methodsThe history and current status of occupational health studies were considered from the perspective of OD surveillance. Interpretative research was done through literature review on occupational health at national, regional and international level. Analyses were focused on countries' experiences in policy development and practice, roles and responsibilities of institutions, multidisciplinary and intersectoral collaboration. OD surveillance models of Turkey, Belgium and the Netherlands were examined through exchange visits. Face-to-face interviews were conducted to explore the peculiarities of legislative and institutional structures, the best and worst practices, and approach principles.

resultsSome countries are more focused on exploring OD trends through effective and cost-efficient researches, with particular attention to new and emerging ODs. Other countries try to reach every single case of OD for compensation and rehabilitation. Each practice has advantages and shortcomings, but they are not mutually exclusive, and thus an effective combination is possible.

conclusionEffective surveillance and registry approaches play a key role in the prevention of ODs. A well-designed system enables monitoring and assessment of OD prevalence and trends, and adoption of preventive measures while improving the effectiveness of redressing and compensation. A robust surveillance does not only provide protection of workers' health but also advances prevention of economic losses.

Indexed as

Intersectoral collaborationOccupational diseasesOccupational healthPreventionWorker’s health surveillance

Identifiers

PMID31890324
PMCPMC6933156
OpenAlexW2976269132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.