Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31890265›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2019

Intervention planning and modification of the BUMP intervention: a digital intervention for the early detection of raised blood pressure in pregnancy.

Rebecca Band, Lisa Hinton, Katherine L Tucker, Lucy C Chappell, Carole Crawford, Marloes Franssen, Sheila Greenfield, James Hodgkinson, Christine McCourt, Richard J McManus and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rebecca Band1Academic unit of psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ UK.
Lisa Hinton2Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Infirmary Quarter University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6082-3151
Katherine L Tucker2Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Infirmary Quarter University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG UK.
Lucy C Chappell3Division of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH UK.
Carole Crawford2Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Infirmary Quarter University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG UK.
Marloes Franssen2Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Infirmary Quarter University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG UK.
Sheila Greenfield4Institute of Applied Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK.
James Hodgkinson4Institute of Applied Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK.
Christine McCourt5Centre for Maternal and Child Health, School of Health Sciences, City University, London, EC1R IUW UK.
Richard J McManus2Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Infirmary Quarter University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG UK.
Jane Sandall3Division of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH UK.
Mauro Dala Santos6Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ UK.
Carmelo Velardo6Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ UK.
Lucy Yardley1Academic unit of psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ UK.

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-02-12-015Department of Health RP-2014-05-019Department of Health RP-PG-0614-20005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertensive disorders in pregnancy, particularly pre-eclampsia, pose a substantial health risk for both maternal and foetal outcomes. The BUMP (Blood Pressure Self-Monitoring in Pregnancy) interventions are being tested in a trial. They aim to facilitate the early detection of raised blood pressure through self-monitoring. This article outlines how the self-monitoring interventions in the BUMP trial were developed and modified using the person-based approach to promote engagement and adherence.

methodsKey behavioural challenges associated with blood pressure self-monitoring in pregnancy were identified through synthesising qualitative pilot data and existing evidence, which informed guiding principles for the development process. Social cognitive theory was identified as an appropriate theoretical framework. A testable logic model was developed to illustrate the hypothesised processes of change associated with the intervention. Iterative qualitative feedback from women and staff informed modifications to the participant materials.

resultsThe evidence synthesis suggested women face challenges integrating self-monitoring into their lives and that adherence is challenging at certain time points in pregnancy (for example, starting maternity leave). Intervention modification included strategies to address adherence but also focussed on modifying outcome expectancies, by providing messages explaining pre-eclampsia and outlining the potential benefits of self-monitoring.

conclusionsWith an in-depth understanding of the target population, several methods and approaches to plan and develop interventions specifically relevant to pregnant women were successfully integrated, to address barriers to behaviour change while ensuring they are easy to engage with, persuasive and acceptable.

Indexed as

Digital interventionHypertensionIntervention planningPerson-based approachPre-eclampsiaPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID31890265
PMCPMC6925434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.