Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31890256›Full record

ArticlePorcine health management2019

Antimicrobial activity of a selection of organic acids, their salts and essential oils against swine enteropathogenic bacteria.

Manuel Gómez-García, Cinta Sol, Pedro J G de Nova, Mónica Puyalto, Luis Mesas, Héctor Puente, Óscar Mencía-Ares, Rubén Miranda, Héctor Argüello, Pedro Rubio and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Porcine health management, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Prebiotic effects ofHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. How DoesFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manuel Gómez-García1Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad de León, Campus de Vegazana, s/n, 24007 León, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7766-8736
Cinta SolNorel SA, Calle Jesús Aprendiz n° 19, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
Pedro J G de Nova1Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad de León, Campus de Vegazana, s/n, 24007 León, Spain.
Mónica PuyaltoNorel SA, Calle Jesús Aprendiz n° 19, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
Luis MesasNorel SA, Calle Jesús Aprendiz n° 19, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
Héctor Puente1Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad de León, Campus de Vegazana, s/n, 24007 León, Spain.
Óscar Mencía-Ares1Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad de León, Campus de Vegazana, s/n, 24007 León, Spain.
Rubén Miranda1Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad de León, Campus de Vegazana, s/n, 24007 León, Spain.
Héctor Argüello1Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad de León, Campus de Vegazana, s/n, 24007 León, Spain.
Pedro Rubio1Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad de León, Campus de Vegazana, s/n, 24007 León, Spain.
Ana Carvajal1Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad de León, Campus de Vegazana, s/n, 24007 León, Spain.
Universidad de León · ESHospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate screening of new alternative antimicrobial compounds is essential for their use to control pathogens in swine production due to the replacement of antibiotics and zinc oxide. Most in vitro studies have separately reported the antimicrobial activity of organic acids and essential oils (EOs) using diverse methods for susceptibility testing. In addition, in vitro outcomes can help in the selection of the suitable antimicrobial compound and effective combinations of these compounds in the control of pathogens of interest in pork production. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determinate the antibacterial activity of six organic acids and six EOs against

resultsAll products tested showed activity against at least one bacterial species, except for black pepper EO. The results showed that formic acid with the shortest chain length was the most effective against

conclusionsThe susceptibility of isolates to EOs was similar, a result that demonstrates a similar activity of these products against phylogenetically unrelated pathogens in contrast to organic acids. In addition, an additive effect was shown for several combinations of these compounds.

Indexed as

Essential oilsFractional inhibitory concentration, enteric pathogensMinimum bactericidal concentrationMinimum inhibitory concentrationPig, feed additives, organic acids

Identifiers

PMID31890256
PMCPMC6935073
OpenAlexW2996930110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.