Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31890245›Full record

ArticleObesity science & practice2019

Patients' reasons for weight loss and their relations to clinical weight loss outcomes in a comprehensive lifestyle intervention.

Leah Boepple, Ian Cero, Ryan J Marek, Sandra Coulon, Janet A Lydecker, Joshua D Brown, Robert Malcolm, Patrick M O'Neil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity science & practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Motivating Weight Loss Among Black Adults in Relationships: Recommendations for Weight Loss Interventions.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leah BoeppleWeight Management Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0961-4637
Ian CeroWeight Management Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.
Ryan J MarekWeight Management Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.
Sandra CoulonWeight Management Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.
Janet A LydeckerWeight Management Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6425-514X
Joshua D BrownWeight Management Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.
Robert MalcolmWeight Management Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.
Patrick M O'NeilWeight Management Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveResearch suggests that individuals seeking weight loss treatment do so for a variety of reasons. Limited work has explored relations of reasons for weight loss to patient characteristics or to weight loss outcomes. The current study examined these relations.

methodsThe sample consisted of 588 patients in a 15-week fee-for-service weight loss programme. Prior to the intervention, patients completed questionnaires including items on reasons for weight loss, demographic characteristics, and a variety of weight-based characteristics. Patients' weight change outcomes were expressed as percent weight loss and also categorized into one of three previously described weight loss trajectories.

resultsThe results of chi-squared and

conclusionsWhile certain reasons for weight loss were more often cited by certain patient groups, no specific reason predicted a better or worse outcome.

Indexed as

motivationobesityoutcomesweight loss

Identifiers

PMID31890245
PMCPMC6934423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.