Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31890241›Full record

ArticleObesity science & practice2019

Enhancing group-based internet obesity treatment: A pilot RCT comparing video and text-based chat.

Delia S West, M Stansbury, R A Krukowski, J Harvey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity science & practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Identifying Social Media-Based Interactions That Help Adults to Adhere to Weight Loss Goals: A Systematic Review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. An Online Weight Loss Intervention for People With Obesity and Poorly Controlled Asthma.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2022
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Can you see me? Participant experience of accessing a weight management programme via group videoconference to overcome barriers to engagement.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  18. A Review of Telemedicine Interventions for Weight Loss.Current cardiovascular risk reports · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Delia S WestArnold School of Public Health University of South Carolina Columbia South Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4375-2785
M StansburyArnold School of Public Health University of South Carolina Columbia South Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3842-4880
R A KrukowskiHealth Sciences Center University of Tennessee Memphis TN.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9193-2783
J HarveyDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences University of Vermont Burlington VT.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9981-1430

Funding

INTERNET SUPPORT FOR LONG-TERM WEIGHT MAINTENANCER01DK056746 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HARVEY, JEAN R, WEST, DELIA SMITH · 2000 to 2019
$10.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK056746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInternet delivery of behavioural weight control interventions offers potential for broad geographic reach and accessibility, but weight losses online fall short of those produced with the same programme delivered in-person. This pilot study examined feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a video-based platform for delivering weekly chat as part of a 6-month, 24-session online group behavioural weight control programme compared with the established text-based format, which has produced the best online weight losses to date.

methodWomen with obesity (N = 32) were randomized to either (a) weekly video group chat sessions and provided with a cellular-enabled scale (Video) or (b) Text-based weekly chat sessions and given a digital scale (Text) and followed for 6 months to determine weight loss and treatment engagement.

resultsWomen randomized to the ideo condition lost more weight than those in the Text condition (-5.0 ± 6.0% vs. -3.0 ± 4.1%, respectively) at 6 months, although the difference was not statistically significant. However, women in the Video condition had significantly greater treatment engagement, with greater self-monitoring and website utilization than those in the Text condition.

conclusionsVideoconference delivery of group-based online weight control accompanied by a cellular-connected scale may promote greater treatment engagement and weight loss than text-based chat. A larger, adequately powered study is warranted to determine which elements drive these enhanced treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

behavioural weight controlonlinevideoconferencingweight loss

Identifiers

PMID31890241
PMCPMC6934426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.