Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31890164›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2019

Effect of heat extraction on water-soluble taste substances in processing products of chilled large yellow croaker (

Fen Zhou, Xi-Chang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fen ZhouCollege of Food Science and Technology Shanghai Ocean University Shanghai China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0434-5220
Xi-Chang WangCollege of Food Science and Technology Shanghai Ocean University Shanghai China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7088-2198

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we analyzed the umami amino acids composition and content in minced meat (MM), fish head meat (HM), and fish roe (R). According to different ratios of material to liquid, we extracted water-soluble taste substances from the three materials and then compared composition and content of the umami amino acids and taste nucleotides in the different water-soluble taste substances. Finally, we analyzed Taste Activity Value (TAV) and the Equivalent Umami Concentration (EUC) between umami amino acids and taste nucleotides. The results showed that umami amino acids total content in MM, HM, and R samples were, respectively, 50.63 mg/100 g, 41.95 mg/100 g, and 67.06 mg/100 g. When the water-soluble taste substances extracted from the above samples were in the "D" state (MM), the "C" state (HM), and the "C" state (R), respectively, the umami amino acid content could be comparable to the original sample. And the highest EUCs were respectively 1.37 g MSG/100 g, 0.87 g MSG/100 g, and 0.49 g MSG/100 g (MSG: Sodium Glutamate). To some extent, the results of this study indicated that the water-soluble taste substances could be equivalent to the original sample and could be further applied as a taste regulator in some respects.

Indexed as

equivalent umami concentration (EUC)taste activity value (TAV)taste nucleotidesumami amino acidswater‐soluble taste substances

Identifiers

PMID31890164
PMCPMC6924313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.