Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31889989›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2019

New hemostatic device for grade IV-V liver injury in porcine model: a proof of concept.

Juan José Segura-Sampedro, Cristina Pineño-Flores, Andrea Craus-Miguel, Rafael Morales-Soriano, Francesc Xavier González-Argente

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A polymer-based systemic hemostat for managing uncontrolled bleeding.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Inflammatory response to the ischaemia-reperfusion insult in the liver after major tissue trauma.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juan José Segura-Sampedro1General & Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0565-3791
Cristina Pineño-Flores1General & Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Andrea Craus-Miguel1General & Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Rafael Morales-Soriano1General & Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Francesc Xavier González-Argente1General & Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The liver is the most injured organ following abdominal trauma. Uncontrolled bleeding remains the main cause of early liver injury-related death, with a mortality rate of 50-54% in the first 24 h after admission and with 80% of operative deaths. Packing and reoperation account for the increased survival in severe liver trauma, and they are recommended for severe liver injuries (grades IV-V).Perihepatic packing can lead to several potential complications. An excessive packing can cause complications due to abdominal compartment syndrome, while a soft packing may be ineffective, and thus, bleeding can continue inadvertently with the consequent hypovolemic shock and potentially death. Methods: We designed a new vacuum-based device to perform perihepatic packing without the negative side-effects of the classic technique. We conducted a prospective pilot feasibility study in a porcine model. We compared the traditional perihepatic packing (PHP) ( Results: Both pigs survived with the new device and showed an equivalent outcome to the one that survived in the traditional technique group. Blood tests were similar too. This suggests that VBP could be at least as effective as traditional PHP. Conclusions: We establish a first step towards the development of a new packing device. A new study with a bigger sample size still in pigs will be conducted. Also, an industrial model of the device is currently in production.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalEquipment DesignFeasibility StudiesHemostaticsLaparoscopyLiverPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesSwineHemostaticsAbdominal traumaDamage controlHemostatic deviceLiver injury

Identifiers

PMID31889989
PMCPMC6916102
OpenAlexW2996412334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.