Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31889980›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2019

Fluctuating light experiments and semi-automated plant phenotyping enabled by self-built growth racks and simple upgrades to the IMAGING-PAM.

Dominik Schneider, Laura S Lopez, Meng Li, Joseph D Crawford, Helmut Kirchhoff, Hans-Henning Kunz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Photoperiod Stress inFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dominik Schneider *1Compact Plants Phenomics Center, Washington State University, PO Box 646340, Pullman, WA 99164-6340 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5846-5033
Laura S Lopez *3Plant Physiology, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, PO Box 644236, Pullman, WA 99164-4236 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4038-9199
Meng Li2Institute of Biological Chemistry, Washington State University, PO Box 646340, Pullman, WA 99164-6340 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9831-8575
Joseph D Crawford3Plant Physiology, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, PO Box 644236, Pullman, WA 99164-4236 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8754-6599
Helmut Kirchhoff2Institute of Biological Chemistry, Washington State University, PO Box 646340, Pullman, WA 99164-6340 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5874-3681
Hans-Henning Kunz3Plant Physiology, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, PO Box 644236, Pullman, WA 99164-4236 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8000-0817

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the last years, several plant science labs have started to employ fluctuating growth light conditions to simulate natural light regimes more closely. Many plant mutants reveal quantifiable effects under fluctuating light despite being indistinguishable from wild-type plants under standard constant light. Moreover, many subtle plant phenotypes become intensified and thus can be studied in more detail. This observation has caused a paradigm shift within the photosynthesis research community and an increasing number of scientists are interested in using fluctuating light growth conditions. However, high installation costs for commercial controllable LED setups as well as costly phenotyping equipment can make it hard for small academic groups to compete in this emerging field.

resultsWe show a simple do-it-yourself approach to enable fluctuating light growth experiments. Our results using previously published fluctuating light sensitive mutants,

conclusionsWith material costs well below USD$1000, it is possible to setup a fluctuating light rack including a constant light control shelf for comparison. This allows more scientists to perform experiments closer to natural light conditions and contribute to an emerging research field. A small addition to the IMAGING-PAM hardware not only increases sample throughput but also enables larger-scale plant phenotyping with automated data analysis.

Indexed as

Data analysis automationDo-it-yourselfFluctuating lightMaker movementPhenotypingPhotosynthesis

Identifiers

PMID31889980
PMCPMC6927185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.