ArticleClinical proteomics2019
Proteomics analysis of colon cancer progression.
Article in Clinical proteomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deciphering the central role of TMOD2 in colorectal cancer progression and metastasis.British journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Article
- Sample Collection Methods in Upper Gastrointestinal Research.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Review
- Article
- Associations of serum keratin 1 with thyroid function and immunity in Graves' disease.PloS one · 2023Article
- Proteomic analysis of low- and high-grade human colon adenocarcinoma tissues and tissue-derived primary cell lines reveals unique biological functions of tumours and new protein biomarker candidates.Clinical proteomics · 2022Article
- Mass spectrometry-based proteomics identify novel serum osteoarthritis biomarkers.Arthritis research & therapy · 2022Article
- Virus-host interaction analysis in colorectal cancer identifies core virus network signature and small molecules.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Metaproteomic Profile of the Colonic Luminal Microbiota From Patients With Colon Cancer.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Article
- A Critical Review of Bottom-Up Proteomics: The Good, the Bad, and the Future of this Field.Proteomes · 2020Review
- Proteomic Profiling of Colon Cancer Tissues: Discovery of New Candidate Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Proteomics of Colorectal Cancer: Tumors, Organoids, and Cell Cultures-A Minireview.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this pilot study was to identify proteins associated with advancement of colon cancer (CC).
methodsA quantitative proteomics approach was used to determine the global changes in the proteome of primary colon cancer from patients with non-cancer normal colon (NC), non-adenomatous colon polyp (NAP), non-metastatic tumor (CC NM) and metastatic tumor (CC M) tissues, to identify up- and down-regulated proteins. Total protein was extracted from each biopsy, trypsin-digested, iTRAQ-labeled and the resulting peptides separated using strong cation exchange (SCX) and reverse-phase (RP) chromatography on-line to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS).
resultsDatabase searching of the MS/MS data resulted in the identification of 2777 proteins which were clustered into groups associated with disease progression. Proteins which were changed in all disease stages including benign, and hence indicative of the earliest molecular perturbations, were strongly associated with spliceosomal activity, cell cycle division, and stromal and cytoskeleton disruption reflecting increased proliferation and expansion into the surrounding healthy tissue. Those proteins changed in cancer stages but not in benign, were linked to inflammation/immune response, loss of cell adhesion, mitochondrial function and autophagy, demonstrating early evidence of cells within the nutrient-poor solid mass either undergoing cell death or adjusting for survival. Caveolin-1, which decreased and Matrix metalloproteinase-9, which increased through the three disease stages compared to normal tissue, was selected to validate the proteomics results, but significant patient-to-patient variation obfuscated interpretation so corroborated the contradictory observations made by others.
conclusionNevertheless, the study has provided significant insights into CC stage progression for further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.