ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2019
The stress model of abutment tooth and periodontal tissues with unilateral mandibular dissociation and loss by precision extracoronal attachment.
Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to explore the application of the precision extracoronal attachment based on three-dimensional finite element stress model in the repair of unilateral mandibular dissociation and loss, the stress distribution of the butment and periodontal tissues when the precision extracoronal attachment was used in unilateral mandibular dissociation and loss was analyzed, so as to provide reference for the application of materials in clinical repair. In this study, the biomechanics of oral cavity and its attachment were analyzed to provide theoretical basis for model construction. Because the degree of periodontal tissue absorption and the number of abutment teeth affected the restoration effect of the coronal precision attachment, the models were established from these two perspectives. The results showed that when the periodontal tissue absorption of both abutment teeth exceeded 1/3, the method of double abutment restoration was not recommended. When three abutments were used, there was a significant decrease compared with the absorption of the periodontal tissue of the double abutment. In clinic, the stress distribution of the distal abutment teeth and its periodontal tissues can be improved by increasing the number of abutment tooth. However, since increasing the number of abutments required an increase in the amount of healthy tooth tissue, it couldn't be blindly selected in the clinic. After comprehensive consideration, it is appropriate to choose two abutment teeth for restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.