Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31889786›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2019

A study on soybean responses to drought stress and rehydration.

Shoukun Dong, Yingze Jiang, Yuchen Dong, Libin Wang, Wenjia Wang, Zezhong Ma, Chao Yan, Chunmei Ma, Lijun Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pulsating Drought and Insect Herbivory Cause Differential Effects on Soybean (Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Effect of membrane rigidification on theFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shoukun DongAgronomy College, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Yingze JiangAgronomy College, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Yuchen DongAgronomy College, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Libin WangAgronomy College, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Wenjia WangAgronomy College, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Zezhong MaAgronomy College, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Chao YanAgronomy College, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Chunmei MaAgronomy College, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Lijun LiuAgronomy College, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate soybean responses to drought stress and growth through metabolism compensation after rehydration, and for the establishment of an optimal water-saving irrigation model, we used the soybean variety Suinong 14 as experimental material and adopted a weighing method for water control in potted plants. We exposed soybean plants to stress treatments at different growth stages using different stress levels and durations. We then studied the effects of drought stress and rehydration on soybean growth and development, osmoregulation, and endogenous hormonal regulations, as well as antioxidant systems. The results showed that drought stress inhibited increases in the soybean plant height and leaf area. This inhibition became more significant as the level, duration, and frequency of the drought stress increased. After rehydration, the soybean plant heights and leaf areas exhibited rapid increases and partial compensation for their decreased sizes. As the level, duration, and frequency of drought stress increased, the compensation effect decreased, but it did not return to the control level. Drought stress reduced the chlorophyll content and relative water content in the soybean leaves and increased the osmolyte contents, antioxidant potential, and peroxidation of the membrane lipids. In addition, the changes mentioned above became more dramatic as the drought stress level, duration, and frequency increased. Upon rehydration, various levels of growth compensation were observed in each physio-biochemical parameter. As the drought stress level, duration, and frequency increased, the compensation effect also increased. Overall, the compensation effect for drought stress that occurred at the early growth stages was higher than that at the later growth stages. Drought stress led to decreases in the ZR/IAA and ZR/ABA ratios in soybean leaves and an increase in the ABA/(IAA + GA + ZR) ratio; thus, the plant growth was inhibited. These hormone ratios exhibited more dramatic changes when the drought stress level became more severe and the stress duration was prolonged. After rehydration, these hormone ratios produced equal compensation effects. Therefore, the compensatory effect of rewatering after drought stress is conditional. Severe stress, especially long-term severe stress, will reduce the compensatory effect. At the same time, drought resistance treatment at seedling stage can improve the adaptability and compensatory effect of re-drought at grain filling stage.

Indexed as

Compensation effectDroughtRe-wateringSoybean

Identifiers

PMID31889786
PMCPMC6923469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.