Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31889751›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental hepatology

Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience from Pakistan.

Abu Bakar H Bhatti, Faisal S Dar, Ammal I Qureshi, Nusrat Y Khan, Haseeb H Zia, Siraj Haider, Najmul H Shah, Atif Rana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abu Bakar H BhattiDepartment of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Faisal S DarDepartment of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Ammal I QureshiDepartment of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Nusrat Y KhanDepartment of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Haseeb H ZiaDepartment of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Siraj HaiderDepartment of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Najmul H ShahDepartment of Hepatology, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Atif RanaDepartment of Radiology, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiving donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an established treatment for patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within Milan criteria. Acceptable outcomes have been demonstrated in patients fulfilling extended criteria. Here, we share our experience with LDLT for patients with HCC within and beyond Milan criteria, with emphasis on poor prognostic factors.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent LDLT between 2012 and 2017 and had HCC proven on explant liver histopathology. A total of 117 patients were included. Patients who died early after transplant (in <30 days) were excluded. For outcomes, patients were divided into prognostic groups. These groups were based on (1) alpha fetoprotein >600, (2) poor differentiation, and (3) the presence of lymphovascular invasion. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was determined using Kaplan-Meier curves.

resultsMedian age was 53 (30-73) years. Median follow-up was 20.3 (1-63.2) months. Median model for end stage liver disease (MELD) score was 19 (9-34). Of a total of 117 patients, 74 (63.2%) patients met Milan criteria. Recurrence rate was 12/117 (10.3%). Actuarial 5-year RFS was 88% and 82% (

conclusionsPatients within Milan criteria have acceptable RFS even in the presence of poor prognostic factors. However, the presence of two or more poor prognostic variables significantly impacts RFS of patients outside Milan criteria.

Indexed as

AFP, Alpha fetoproteinDDLT, Deceased donor liver transplantationHCC, Hepatocellular carcinomaLDLT, Living donor liver transplantationliver transplantationMilan criteriaNLR, Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioPPF, Poor prognostic factorRFS, Recurrence-free survivalsurvivalTACE, Transarterial chemoembolization

Identifiers

PMID31889751
PMCPMC6926250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.