Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31889740›Full record

ArticleStatistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics2018

Bayesian Approaches for Missing Not at Random Outcome Data: The Role of Identifying Restrictions.

Antonio R Linero, Michael J Daniels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Impact of Sparse Datasets When Harmonizing Data from Studies with Different Measures of the Same Construct.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Causal mediation and sensitivity analysis for mixed-scale data.Statistical methods in medical research · 2023
    Article
  13. Hierarchical Bayesian non-response models for error rates in forensic black-box studies.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Bayesian semi-parametric G-computation for causal inference in a cohort study with MNAR dropout and death.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2021
    Article
  20. Nonstandard conditionally specified models for nonignorable missing data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Antonio R LineroDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, arlinero@stat.fsu.edu.
Michael J DanielsDepartment of Statistics, University of Florida, daniels@ufl.edu.

Funding

NSABP Foreign AccrualsU10CA037377 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WOLMARK, NORMAN · 1985 to 2014
$116.5M
STUDY TO ASSESS RALOXIFENE FOR PREVENTING BREAST CANCERU10CA069974 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COSTANTINO, JOSEPH P. · 1995 to 2013
$62.4M
RESEARCH METHODS COREP30MH086043 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI IALONGO, NICHOLAS S · 2009 to 2013
$9.2M
BAYESIAN APPROACHES FOR MISSINGNESS AND CAUSALITY IN CANCER AND BEHAVIOR STUDIESR01CA183854 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DANIELS, MICHAEL J · 2014 to 2019
$1.7M
Statistical Methods for HIV/AIDS ResearchR01AI078835 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, MEI CHENG · 2008 to 2011
$1.6M
Analyzing Complex Longitudinal Data in Behavior SciencesR01HL079457 · NHLBI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI HOGAN, JOSEPH W · 2004 to 2006
$770k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA183854NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037377NCI NIH HHS U10 CA069974NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL079457NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI078835NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH086043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Missing data is almost always present in real datasets, and introduces several statistical issues. One fundamental issue is that, in the absence of strong uncheckable assumptions, effects of interest are typically not nonparametrically identified. In this article, we review the generic approach of the use of identifying restrictions from a likelihood-based perspective, and provide points of contact for several recently proposed methods. An emphasis of this review is on restrictions for nonmonotone missingness, a subject that has been treated sparingly in the literature. We also present a general, fully-Bayesian, approach which is widely applicable and capable of handling a variety of identifying restrictions in a uniform manner.

Indexed as

missing datamixture modelsMNARmultiple imputationnon-ignorable missingnessnonparametric Bayes

Identifiers

PMID31889740
PMCPMC6936760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.