Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31889286›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

A field pilot-scale study on heavy metal-contaminated soil washing by using an environmentally friendly agent-poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA).

Yen-Ping Peng, Yu-Chen Chang, Ku-Fan Chen, Ching-Hsiang Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Hydrocarbon Degradation and Microbial Survival Improvement in Response to γ-Polyglutamic Acid Application.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Water pollution prevention and state of the art treatment technologies.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yen-Ping PengDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tunghai University, Xitun, Taichung 40704, Taiwan.
Yu-Chen ChangDepartment of Civil Engineering, National Chi Nan University, 1 Univ. Rd, Puli, Nantou 54561, Taiwan.
Ku-Fan ChenDepartment of Civil Engineering, National Chi Nan University, 1 Univ. Rd, Puli, Nantou 54561, Taiwan. kfchen@ncnu.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9572-3134
Ching-Hsiang WangDepartment of Civil Engineering, National Chi Nan University, 1 Univ. Rd, Puli, Nantou 54561, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, a farmland contaminated by heavy metals (Cu, Zn, Ni, and Cr) was selected to evaluate the performance of poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA) on the removal of heavy metals in soil washing. The highest heavy metal concentrations at the contaminated site were Cu: 1180 mg/kg, Zn: 1450 mg/kg, Ni: 287 mg/kg, and Cr: 316 mg/kg. Batch experiments designed by Taguchi Method were conducted first to assess the effect of different washing conditions on the removal of heavy metals in laboratory. The results of batch experiments show that factors that affected the removal efficiency of heavy metals was of the order γ-PGA concentration > washing time > liquid/soil ratio > rotational speed. The optimal operating parameters for heavy metal removal were γ-PGA 3.5%, liquid/soil ratio 15/1, washing time 60 min, and rotational speed 100 rpm. Under the optimal conditions, up to 50.7% of the major target metal, Cu, was removed. Heavy metals in the soil were mainly Fe-Mn oxide bound and organically bound. On-site treatment using the optimal operating parameters caused 54.3% of Cu removal. When the soil was washed 3 times by γ-PGA, the removal efficiency of Cu was improved to 74.3%. After the treatment, the change in soil bacterial number was insignificant, indicating that γ-PGA is an environmentally friendly washing reagent.

Indexed as

Glutamic AcidMetals, HeavyPolyglutamic AcidSoilSoil PollutantsGlutamic AcidMetals, Heavypoly(gamma-glutamic acid)Polyglutamic AcidSoilSoil PollutantsGreen agentHeavy metalPoly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA)Soil washing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.