Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31889284›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

How do FDI and technical innovation affect environmental quality? Evidence from China.

Yu Hao, Yerui Wu, Haitao Wu, Siyu Ren

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
47.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 206 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Does the pollution halo hypothesis exist in this "better" world? The evidence from STIRPAT model.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Does Technological Innovation Curb OInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Can environmental regulations break down domestic market segmentation? Evidence from China.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  15. Does Overseas Investment Raise Corporate Environmental Protection? Evidence from Chinese A-List Companies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. How FDI and technology innovation mitigate COEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  20. Does Environmental Regulation Promote Environmental Innovation? An Empirical Study of Cities in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yu HaoCenter for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.
Yerui WuCenter for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.
Haitao WuCenter for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China. 15875706@qq.com.
Siyu RenCollege of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, 830047, China.
Beijing Institute of Technology · CNKey Laboratory of Nuclear Radiation and Nuclear Energy Technology · CNXinjiang University · CN

Funding

Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 71761137001, 71403015, 71521002Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (CN) 17JDYJA009Key Research and Development Program of Jiangxi Province (CN) 2016YFA0602801, 2016YFA0602603University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN) 9162013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foreign direct investment (FDI) is an important driving force for economic growth and technological innovation, but it also brings environmental pollution problems along with economic development. From the perspective of technological innovation, the impact of FDI on China's environmental pollution deserves further study. With the spatial econometric tools employed to account for the potential spatial dependence of environmental pollution, this study uses the panel data of 30 province-level units in China from 1998 to 2016 to investigate the impact of FDI and technological innovation on environmental pollution. The results show that increased FDI can reduce environmental pollution, confirming the existence of the "pollution halo hypothesis"; technological innovation can reduce the emissions of sulfur dioxide and smoke dust but increase the chemical oxygen demand. Therefore, vigorous introduction of foreign capital is good for sustainable development for government, but it is also necessary to pay attention to screening and identifying environment-friendly enterprises with advanced production technology and management experience and to reject high-pollution and high-energy-consuming enterprises eliminated by developed countries.

Indexed as

Economic DevelopmentInvestmentsCarbon DioxideChinaEnvironmental PollutionInternationalityCarbon DioxideEnvironmental pollutionForeign direct investment (FDI)Spatial Durbin modelSpatial interdependenceTechnological innovation

Identifiers

PMID31889284
OpenAlexW2998506436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.