ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2020
EGFR amplification is a real independent prognostic impact factor between young adults and adults over 45yo with wild-type glioblastoma?
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Mapping the global research landscape and innovations on elderly glioma: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- The clinical impact of EGFR alterations in elderly glioblastoma patients: results from a real-life cohort.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- MEX3A is a diagnostic, independent prognostic biomarker and a promising therapeutic target in glioblastoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Molecular Profile as an Outcome Predictor in Glioblastoma along with MRI Features and Surgical Resection: A Scoping Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Resection of supratentorial high-grade gliomas availing of neuronavigation matched intraoperative ultrasound and Fluorescein: How far is it safe to push the resection?World neurosurgery: X · 2024Article
- Potential Diagnostic and Clinical Significance of Selected Genetic Alterations in Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Unilateral biportal endoscopic vs. open surgery in the treatment of young obese patients' lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective study.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Novel insight into histological and molecular astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, Grade 4 by the updated WHO classification of central nervous system tumors.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Prognostic analysis and nomogram construction for older patients with IDH-wild-type glioblastoma.Heliyon · 2023Article
- The Role of EGFR Amplification in Deep Venous Thrombosis Occurrence in IDH Wild-Type Glioblastoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- EGFR-Driven Mutation in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Influences the Features and Outcome of Brain Metastases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Distribution and favorable prognostic implication of genomic EGFR alterations in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- The Surgical Risk Factors of Giant Intracranial Meningiomas: A Multi-Centric Retrospective Analysis of Large Case Serie.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Intracranial Meningioma in Elderly Patients. Retrospective Multicentric Risk and Surgical Factors Study of Morbidity and Mortality.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Correlation between dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI and genomic alterations in glioblastoma.Neuroradiology · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn 2019 a group of University of Pennsylvania (Hoffman et al., J Neurooncol 145: 321-328, 2019) aimed to explore the prognostic impact of expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), one of the most common genetic alterations in WT-GBM, in young adults with IDH-WT GBM, suggesting an inferior outcomes in young adults (< 45yo) with newly diagnosed, IDH-WT GBM. At the same time, our group were considering the dimension of this subpopulation treated in our centre, and we performed the same analysis, comparing datas with affected elderly adults.
methodsWe explore the prognostic impact of EGFR expression status in young adults with IDH-WT GBM, and compare this impact with the affected elderly adults. We therefore analyzed clinical characteristics, tumor genetics, and clinical outcomes in a cohort of adults aged 18-45 years with newly diagnosed WT GBM. We selected a total of 146 patients affected by newly diagnosed IDH-WT GBM who underwent surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy in our Institution in the period ranging between January 2014 and December 2016. We focused primarily on the prognostic impact of EGFR expression.
resultsWe confirmed through a Bivariate Analysis that the Age of the Patients, the Volume of the lesions, were statistically strongly associated with the survival parameters; The general OS of the cohort presented a breakthrough point between the patients who were respectively younger and older than 45 years, EGFR mutation was per se not associated to a survival reduction in all the cohort patients. When analyzing exclusively the Survival parameters of the patients whose age was under 40, it was possible to outline a non statistically significant trend towards a lesser OS in younger patients harboring an EGFR expression.
conclusionsOnce again the main difference in terms of OS in GBM is shown in a EOR and in Age. To our knowledge, ours is the second study (Hoffman et al., J Neurooncol 145: 321-328, 2019) to evaluate the prognostic impact of EGFR CN gain specifically in young adults with IDH-WT GBM and in the era of modern radiation and Temozolomide, but is the first one to compares this impact with a population of adults over 45, and correlates this date with clinical onset, dimension and localization of disease between this groups. We suggest other centers to evaluate this important finding with a larger number of patients and we are inclined to accept collaborations to increase the power of this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.