Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31889239›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2020

EGFR amplification is a real independent prognostic impact factor between young adults and adults over 45yo with wild-type glioblastoma?

Daniele Armocida, Alessandro Pesce, Alessandro Frati, Antonio Santoro, Maurizio Salvati

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniele ArmocidaHuman Neurosciences Department Neurosurgery Division "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy. danielearmocida@yahoo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6550-5534
Alessandro PesceHuman Neurosciences Department Neurosurgery Division "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro FratiHuman Neurosciences Department Neurosurgery Division "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy.
Antonio SantoroHuman Neurosciences Department Neurosurgery Division "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy.
Maurizio SalvatiIRCCS "Neuromed", Pozzilli, IS, Italy.
Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2019 a group of University of Pennsylvania (Hoffman et al., J Neurooncol 145: 321-328, 2019) aimed to explore the prognostic impact of expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), one of the most common genetic alterations in WT-GBM, in young adults with IDH-WT GBM, suggesting an inferior outcomes in young adults (< 45yo) with newly diagnosed, IDH-WT GBM. At the same time, our group were considering the dimension of this subpopulation treated in our centre, and we performed the same analysis, comparing datas with affected elderly adults.

methodsWe explore the prognostic impact of EGFR expression status in young adults with IDH-WT GBM, and compare this impact with the affected elderly adults. We therefore analyzed clinical characteristics, tumor genetics, and clinical outcomes in a cohort of adults aged 18-45 years with newly diagnosed WT GBM. We selected a total of 146 patients affected by newly diagnosed IDH-WT GBM who underwent surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy in our Institution in the period ranging between January 2014 and December 2016. We focused primarily on the prognostic impact of EGFR expression.

resultsWe confirmed through a Bivariate Analysis that the Age of the Patients, the Volume of the lesions, were statistically strongly associated with the survival parameters; The general OS of the cohort presented a breakthrough point between the patients who were respectively younger and older than 45 years, EGFR mutation was per se not associated to a survival reduction in all the cohort patients. When analyzing exclusively the Survival parameters of the patients whose age was under 40, it was possible to outline a non statistically significant trend towards a lesser OS in younger patients harboring an EGFR expression.

conclusionsOnce again the main difference in terms of OS in GBM is shown in a EOR and in Age. To our knowledge, ours is the second study (Hoffman et al., J Neurooncol 145: 321-328, 2019) to evaluate the prognostic impact of EGFR CN gain specifically in young adults with IDH-WT GBM and in the era of modern radiation and Temozolomide, but is the first one to compares this impact with a population of adults over 45, and correlates this date with clinical onset, dimension and localization of disease between this groups. We suggest other centers to evaluate this important finding with a larger number of patients and we are inclined to accept collaborations to increase the power of this study.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationMutationAdolescentAdultBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsErbB ReceptorsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsEGFRGlioblastomaIDHKi67Long term survivalp53Prognostic factor

Identifiers

PMID31889239
OpenAlexW2996820452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.