ArticleZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2020
[Clinical significance of determination of DFS70 antibodies to rule out connective tissue diseases].
Article in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anti-DFS70 Antibodies for Differentiating Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease in Patients with Positive ANA Tests: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Exploring the predictive power of antinuclear antibodies and Rheumatoid factor correlations in anticipating therapeutic outcomes for female patients with coexisting Sjögren's syndrome and Rheumatoid arthritis.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConnective tissue diseases (CTD) are autoimmune diseases highly associated with the presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANA). Since ANA and musculoskeletal symptoms are not uncommon in the general population, differential diagnostic challenges frequently occur for the treating physician. Dense fine speckled antibodies (DFS70) were recently discovered but their presence appeared to be rare in CTD.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study a total of 270 patients treated in the Rheumatism Center of the Ruhr Area (Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet) were preferentially included, when they were ANA+ (≥1:80). Other autoantibodies and DFS70 antibodies were also investigated. The diagnosis of CTD was confirmed by rheumatologists. The sensitivity, specificity and the positive predictive value of DFS70 antibodies were differentially evaluated for various ANA titers.
resultsIn 91 (33.7%) of the ANA+ patients (33.7%) the diagnosis of CTD was confirmed and in 84 (92.3%) the ANA titer was ≥1:160. The DFS70 antibodies were detected in 17 out of 130 ANA+ patients without CTD (13.1%) versus 2 ANA+ patients (2.2%) with CTD (p = 0.027). None of the patients with ANA 1:80 had DFS70 antibodies. The specificity of DFS70 antibodies to detect the absence of CTD was 97.6%, the sensitivity was 13.1% and the positive predictive value was 89.5%. There was almost no effect of the strength of the different ANA titers.
conclusionIt was found that DFS70 antibodies are rarely present in ANA+ patients with CTD but the diagnosis of CTD cannot be reliably ruled out solely by the presence of DFS70 antibodies; however, the high specificity of DFS70 antibodies can be of clinical importance in unclear situations and in cases of anxious patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.