Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31889210›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2020

[Dyspnea : A challenging symptom in the primary care setting].

Georg Fröhlich, Kai Schorn, Heike Fröhlich

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Georg FröhlichInternistisch-hausärztliche Praxis mit Schwerpunkt Diabetes, Vorhonig 5, 65620, Waldbrunn, Deutschland. froehlich.georg82@web.de.
Kai SchornHausärztliche Gemeinschaftspraxis, Berlin, Deutschland.
Heike FröhlichInternistisch-hausärztliche Praxis mit Schwerpunkt Diabetes, Vorhonig 5, 65620, Waldbrunn, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dyspnea is a very common symptom leading to visits to a general physician (GP). Correct differential diagnosis is the major challenge for the GP. There are no guidelines on dyspnea. This review provides an overview of the main causal diseases for dyspnea, presents methods for history taking and differential diagnosis, and specifies the role of GPs in the primary care setting in the case of dyspnea.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareDiagnosis, DifferentialDyspneaHumansDiagnosis, differential, dyspneaDyspnea, acuteDyspnea, chronicPhysical examinationPrimary health care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.