Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31888977›Full record

ArticleInjury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention2020

Using Bluetooth beacon technology to reduce distracted pedestrian behaviour: a cross-over trial study protocol.

David C Schwebel, Ragib Hasan, Russell Griffin

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David C SchwebelDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA schwebel@uab.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2141-8970
Ragib HasanDepartment of Computer Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Russell GriffinDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

Funding

Using Bluetooth Beacon Technology to Reduce Distracted Pedestrian BehaviorR21HD095270 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI HASAN, RAGIB, SCHWEBEL, DAVID C · 2018 to 2019
$391k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD095270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOver 6400 American pedestrians die annually, a figure that is currently increasing. One hypothesised reason for the increasing trend is the role of mobile technology in distracting both pedestrians and drivers. Scientists and policy-makers have attended somewhat to distracted driving, but attention to distracted pedestrian behaviour has lagged. We will evaluate Bluetooth beacon technology as a means to alert and warn pedestrians when they approach intersections, reminding them to attend to the traffic environment and cross streets safely.

methodsBluetooth beacons are small devices that broadcast information unidirectionally within a closed proximal network. We will place beacons at an intersection frequently trafficked by urban college students. From there, the beacons will transmit to an app installed on users' smartphones, signalling users to attend to their environment and cross the street safely. A cross-over trial will evaluate the app with 411 adults who frequently cross the target intersection on an urban university campus. We will monitor those participants' behaviour over three distinct time periods: (1) 3 weeks without the app being activated, (2) 3 weeks with the app activated and (3) 4 weeks without the app activated to assess retention of behaviour. Throughout the 10-week period, we will gather information to evaluate whether the intervention changes distracted pedestrian behaviour using a logistic regression to estimate the likelihood of key behavioural outcome measures and adjusting for any residual confounding. We also will test for changes in perceived risk. The trial will follow CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement guidelines, as modified for cross-over design studies.

conclusionIf this program proves successful, it offers exciting implications for future testing and ultimately for broad distribution to reduce distracted pedestrian behavior. We discuss issues of feasibility, acceptability and scalability.

Indexed as

PedestriansSmartphoneAccidents, TrafficAdolescentAdultAttentionClinical Trials as TopicCross-Over StudiesDistracted DrivingFemaleHumansMaleMobile ApplicationsSafetyStudentsUniversitiesbehavioural changecase-cross-over studydistractionpassive safetypedestrianpublic health

Identifiers

PMID31888977
PMCPMC7245539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.