Observational studyScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2019
Impact of a goal-directed factor-based coagulation management on thromboembolic events following major trauma.
Observational study in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07506473 (Intermediate Versus Standard Dose Enoxaparin to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism in Severe Trauma Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intermediate Versus Standard Dose Enoxaparin to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism in Severe Trauma Patients: a Multicenter Double Blind Randomised Controlled Trial
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quick model-based viscoelastic clot strength predictions from blood protein concentrations for cybermedical coagulation control.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Personalized modulation of coagulation factors using a thrombin dynamics model to treat trauma-induced coagulopathy.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2021Article
- Trauma-induced coagulopathy.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2021Review
- Normalization of blood clotting characteristics using prothrombin complex concentrate, fibrinogen and FXIII in an albumin based fluid: experimental studies in thromboelastometry.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA factor-based coagulation management following major trauma is recommended as standard of care by the European Trauma Treatment Guidelines. However, concerns about the thromboembolic risk of this approach are still prevalent. Our study therefore aims to assess if such a haemostatic management is associated with an increased risk for thromboembolic events.
methodsIn this retrospective observational study carried out at the University Hospital Zurich we compared two three-year periods before (period 1: 2005-2007) and after (period 2: 2012-2014) implementation of a factor-based coagulation algorithm. We included all adult patients following major trauma primarily admitted to the University Hospital Zurich. Thromboembolic events were defined as a new in-hospital appearance of any peripheral thrombosis, arterial embolism, pulmonary embolism, stroke or myocardial infarction. A logistic regression was performed to investigate the association of thromboembolic events with possible confounders such as age, sex, specific Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) subgroups, allogeneic blood products, and the coagulation management.
resultsOut of 1138 patients, 772 met the inclusion criteria: 344 patients in period 1 and 428 patients in period 2. Thromboembolic events were present in 25 patients (7.3%) of period 1 and in 42 patients (9.8%) of period 2 (raw OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.83 to 2.33, p = 0.21). Only AIS extremities (adjusted OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.52, p = 0.015) and exposure to allogeneic blood products (adjusted OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.33 to 4.30, p = 0.004) were independently associated with thromboembolic events in the logistic regression, but the factor-based coagulation management was not (adjusted OR 1.60, 95% CI 0.90-2.86, p = 0.11).
conclusionThere is no evidence that a goal-directed, factor-based coagulation management is associated with an increased risk for thromboembolic events following major trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.