Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31888705›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2019

Defining benefit threshold for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in children with sepsis-a binational multicenter cohort study.

Luregn J Schlapbach, Roberto Chiletti, Lahn Straney, Marino Festa, Daniel Alexander, Warwick Butt, Graeme MacLaren, Australian & New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Centre for Outcomes & Resource Evaluation (CORE) and the Australian & New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Paediatric Study Group

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Central or Peripheral Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Pediatric Sepsis: Outcomes Comparison in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Dataset, 2000-2021.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Paediatric Study Group (ANZICS PSG): 20 Years of Collaborative Research.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Updates on pediatric sepsis.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Editorial: Sepsis in Neonates and Children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Luregn J SchlapbachPaediatric Critical Care Research Group, Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. l.schlapbach@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2281-2598
Roberto ChilettiUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Lahn StraneyPaediatric Critical Care Research Group, Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Marino FestaPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, Australia.
Daniel AlexanderPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Warwick ButtPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Graeme MacLarenPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Australian & New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Centre for Outcomes & Resource Evaluation (CORE) and the Australian & New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Paediatric Study Group
Royal Children's Hospital · AUThe University of Queensland · AUChildren's Hospital at Westmead · AUPrincess Margaret Hospital for Children · AU

Funding

Children's Hospital Foundation NANational Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and New Zealand Practitioner Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe surviving sepsis campaign recommends consideration for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in refractory septic shock. We aimed to define the benefit threshold of ECMO in pediatric septic shock.

methodsRetrospective binational multicenter cohort study of all ICUs contributing to the Australian and New Zealand Paediatric Intensive Care Registry. We included patients < 16 years admitted to ICU with sepsis and septic shock between 2002 and 2016. Sepsis-specific risk-adjusted models to establish ECMO benefit thresholds with mortality as the primary outcome were performed. Models were based on clinical variables available early after admission to ICU. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of survival in children treated with ECMO.

resultsFive thousand sixty-two children with sepsis and septic shock met eligibility criteria, of which 80 (1.6%) were treated with veno-arterial ECMO. A model based on 12 clinical variables predicted mortality with an AUROC of 0.879 (95% CI 0.864-0.895). The benefit threshold was calculated as 47.1% predicted risk of mortality. The observed mortality for children treated with ECMO below the threshold was 41.8% (23 deaths), compared to a predicted mortality of 30.0% as per the baseline model (16.5 deaths; standardized mortality rate 1.40, 95% CI 0.89-2.09). Among patients above the benefit threshold, the observed mortality was 52.0% (13 deaths) compared to 68.2% as per the baseline model (16.5 deaths; standardized mortality rate 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.92). Multivariable analyses identified lower lactate, the absence of cardiac arrest prior to ECMO, and the central cannulation (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.10-0.98, p = 0.046) as significant predictors of survival for those treated with VA-ECMO.

conclusionsThis binational study demonstrates that a rapidly available sepsis mortality prediction model can define thresholds for survival benefit in children with septic shock considered for ECMO. Survival on ECMO was associated with central cannulation. Our findings suggest that a fully powered RCT on ECMO in sepsis is unlikely to be feasible.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationAdolescentAustralasiaChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, PediatricMultivariate AnalysisRetrospective StudiesSepsisShock, SepticStatistics, NonparametricChildhoodExtracorporeal life supportExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationInfectionMortalityPediatricPredictionSepsisSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID31888705
PMCPMC6937937
OpenAlexW2998085701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.