Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31888544›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2019

Impact of dexamethasone-sparing regimens on delayed nausea caused by moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a meta-analysis of randomised evidence.

Luigi Celio, Erminio Bonizzoni, Emma Zattarin, Paolo Codega, Filippo de Braud, Matti Aapro

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Multi-day vs single-day dexamethasone for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. 2023 updated MASCC/ESMO consensus recommendations: prevention of nausea and vomiting following high-emetic-risk antineoplastic agents.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. SEOM clinical guideline emesis (2021).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Guideline
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Efficacy of steroid-omitting antiemetic therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving nano-liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Luigi CelioMedical Oncology Unit 1, Fondazione IRCCS "Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori", Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy. luigi.celio@istitutotumori.mi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6849-9838
Erminio BonizzoniSection of Medical Statistics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Milan, Campus Cascina Rosa, Via Augusto Vanzetti 5, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Emma ZattarinMedical Oncology Unit 1, Fondazione IRCCS "Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori", Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Paolo CodegaMedical Affairs Department, Italfarmaco SpA, Via dei Lavoratori 54, 20092, Cinisello Balsamo, Italy.
Filippo de BraudMedical Oncology Unit 1, Fondazione IRCCS "Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori", Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Matti AaproCancer Center, Clinique de Genolier, Route du Muids 3, 1272, Genolier, Switzerland.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITClinique de Genolier · CHItalfarmaco (Italy) · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNausea can be particularly prominent during the delayed period. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of the available randomised evidence to assess the average effect of palonosetron plus one-day dexamethasone (DEX; also called the DEX-sparing strategy) compared with palonosetron plus 3-day DEX for control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), focusing on delayed nausea.

methodsEligible studies were identified through MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL. Data on acute and delayed CINV were collected. Efficacy end points were complete response (CR; no vomiting, and no use of rescue medication), complete protection (CP; CR plus no clinically significant nausea), and total control (TC; CR plus no nausea) during the delayed period (days 2-5 after chemotherapy initiation). All randomised studies comparing palonosetron plus single-dose DEX (with or without another active agent) on day 1 followed by either no further DEX or additional DEX doses (both alone or in combination with another active agent) qualified.

resultsOf 864 citations screened, 8 studies with 1970 patients were included in the meta-analysis. During the delayed period, the combined odds ratio (OR) for all comparisons was 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-1.12) for CR, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.71-1.03) for CP, and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.77-1.11) for TC in patients undergoing moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) or anthracycline and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (AC). The absolute risk difference (RD) computations for all end points in the delayed period did not exceed the threshold of - 4% (range, - 1% to - 4%). The effect was similar in subgroups defined by various study design parameters. The absolute RD computations in the acute period did not exceed the threshold of 1% (range, 0 to 1%). For one-day vs. 3-day DEX, numbers needed to be treated in order for one additional patient to not experience CR, CP and TC over the delayed period were 100, 25 and 50, respectively.

conclusionsThis meta-analysis demonstrates that DEX-sparing regimens do not cause any significant loss in protection against not only vomiting but also nausea induced by single-day MEC or AC during the delayed period. These data should lead clinicians to optimise use of prophylactic DEX in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDexamethasoneDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansNauseaNeoplasmsOdds RatioRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVomitingWithholding TreatmentDexamethasoneACDexamethasoneEmesisMeta-analysisModerately emetogenic chemotherapyNauseaPalonosetron

Identifiers

PMID31888544
PMCPMC6937643
OpenAlexW2997532927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.