Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31888539›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2019

Feasibility evaluation of micro-optical coherence tomography (μOCT) for rapid brain tumor type and grade discriminations: μOCT images versus pathology.

Xiaojun Yu, Chi Hu, Wenfei Zhang, Jie Zhou, Qianshan Ding, M T Sadiq, Zeming Fan, Zhaohui Yuan, Linbo Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The neurosurgical benefit of contactlessFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaojun YuSchool Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710072, People's Republic of China. XJYU@nwpu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-7361-0780
Chi HuSchool Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710072, People's Republic of China.
Wenfei ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, People's Republic of China.
Jie ZhouSchool of Medicine, Northwest University, Xi'an, 710069, People's Republic of China.
Qianshan DingSchool of Medicine, Northwest University, Xi'an, 710069, People's Republic of China.
M T SadiqSchool Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710072, People's Republic of China.
Zeming FanSchool Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710072, People's Republic of China.
Zhaohui YuanSchool Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710072, People's Republic of China.
Linbo LiuSchool of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore City, 639798, Singapore.
Northwestern Polytechnical University · CNNorthwest University · CNNanyang Technological University · SGWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrecise identification, discrimination and assessment of central nervous system (CNS) tumors is of critical importance to brain neoplasm treatment. Due to the complexity and limited resolutions of the existing diagnostic tools, however, it is difficult to identify the tumors and their boundaries precisely in clinical practice, and thus, the conventional way of brain neoplasm treatment relies mainly on the experiences of neurosurgeons to make resection decisions in the surgery process. The purpose of this study is to explore the potential of Micro-optical coherence tomography (μOCT) as an intraoperative diagnostic imaging tool for identifying and discriminating glioma and meningioma with their microstructure imaging ex vivo, which thus may help neurosurgeons to perform precise surgery with low costs and reduced burdens.

methodsFresh glioma and meningioma samples were resected from patients, and then slices of such samples were excised and imaged instantly ex vivo with a lab-built μOCT, which achieves a spatial resolution of ~ 2.0 μm (μm). The acquired optical coherence tomography (OCT) images were pathologically evaluated and compared to their corresponding histology for both tumor type and tumor grade discriminations in different cases.

resultsBy using the lab-built μOCT, both the cross-sectional and en face images of glioma and meningioma were acquired ex vivo. Based upon the morphology results, both the glioma and meningioma types as well as the glioma grades were assessed and discriminated. Comparisons between OCT imaging results and histology showed that typical tissue microstructures of glioma and meningioma could be clearly identified and confirmed the type and grade discriminations with satisfactory accuracy.

conclusionsμOCT could provide high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) imaging of the glioma and meningioma tissue microstructures rapidly ex vivo. μOCT imaging results could help discriminate both tumor types and grades, which illustrates the potential of μOCT as an intraoperative diagnostic imaging tool to help neurosurgeons perform their surgery precisely in tumor treatment process.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialFeasibility StudiesFemaleGliomaHumansIntraoperative PeriodMaleMeningiomaNeoplasm GradingTomography, Optical CoherenceX-Ray MicrotomographyGliomaMeningiomaMicro-OCTPatholgoyTumor discrimination

Identifiers

PMID31888539
PMCPMC6937964
OpenAlexW2996790420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.