Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31888480›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

An ancestry informative marker panel design for individual ancestry estimation of Hispanic population using whole exome sequencing data.

Li-Ju Wang, Catherine W Zhang, Sophia C Su, Hung-I H Chen, Yu-Chiao Chiu, Zhao Lai, Hakim Bouamar, Amelie G Ramirez, Francisco G Cigarroa, Lu-Zhe Sun and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Gene variants, oxidative stress and inflammation in Colombian populationsBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Genetic Polymorphism in theFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Li-Ju WangGreehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Catherine W ZhangGreehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Sophia C SuGreehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Hung-I H ChenGreehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Yu-Chiao ChiuGreehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Zhao LaiGreehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Hakim BouamarDepartment of Cell Systems and Anatomy, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Amelie G RamirezDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Francisco G CigarroaDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Lu-Zhe SunDepartment of Cell Systems and Anatomy, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Yidong ChenGreehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA. cheny8@uthscsa.edu.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USThe University of Texas at San Antonio · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEuropeans and American Indians were major genetic ancestry of Hispanics in the U.S. These ancestral groups have markedly different incidence rates and outcomes in many types of cancers. Therefore, the genetic admixture may cause biased genetic association study with cancer susceptibility variants specifically in Hispanics. For example, the incidence rate of liver cancer has been shown with substantial disparity between Hispanic, Asian and non-Hispanic white populations. Currently, ancestry informative marker (AIM) panels have been widely utilized with up to a few hundred ancestry-informative single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to infer ancestry admixture. Notably, current available AIMs are predominantly located in intron and intergenic regions, while the whole exome sequencing (WES) protocols commonly used in translational research and clinical practice do not cover these markers. Thus, it remains challenging to accurately determine a patient's admixture proportion without additional DNA testing.

resultsIn this study we designed an unique AIM panel that infers 3-way genetic admixture from three distinct and selective continental populations (African (AFR), European (EUR), and East Asian (EAS)) within evolutionarily conserved exonic regions. Initially, about 1 million exonic SNPs from selective three populations in the 1000 Genomes Project were trimmed by their linkage disequilibrium (LD), restricted to biallelic variants, and finally we optimized to an AIM panel with 250 SNP markers, or the UT-AIM250 panel, using their ancestral informativeness statistics. Comparing to published AIM panels, UT-AIM250 performed better accuracy when we tested with three ancestral populations (accuracy: 0.995 ± 0.012 for AFR, 0.997 ± 0.007 for EUR, and 0.994 ± 0.012 for EAS). We further demonstrated the performance of the UT-AIM250 panel to admixed American (AMR) samples of the 1000 Genomes Project and obtained similar results (AFR, 0.085 ± 0.098; EUR, 0.665 ± 0.182; and EAS, 0.250 ± 0.205) to previously published AIM panels (Phillips-AIM34: AFR, 0.096 ± 0.127, EUR, 0.575 ± 0.290, and EAS, 0.330 ± 0.315; Wei-AIM278: AFR, 0.070 ± 0.096, EUR, 0.537 ± 0.267, and EAS, 0.393 ± 0.300). Subsequently, we applied the UT-AIM250 panel to a clinical dataset of 26 self-reported Hispanic patients in South Texas with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We estimated the admixture proportions using WES data of adjacent non-cancer liver tissues (AFR, 0.065 ± 0.043; EUR, 0.594 ± 0.150; and EAS, 0.341 ± 0.160). Similar admixture proportions were identified from corresponding tumor tissues. In addition, we estimated admixture proportions of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) collection of hepatocellular carcinoma (TCGA-LIHC) samples (376 patients) using the UT-AIM250 panel. The panel obtained consistent admixture proportions from tumor and matched normal tissues, identified 3 possible incorrectly reported race/ethnicity, and/or provided race/ethnicity determination if necessary.

conclusionsHere we demonstrated the feasibility of using evolutionarily conserved exonic regions to infer admixture proportions and provided a robust and reliable control for sample collection or patient stratification for genetic analysis. R implementation of UT-AIM250 is available at https://github.com/chenlabgccri/UT-AIM250.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularEthnicityExonsGene FrequencyGenetics, PopulationGenetic TestingGenome, HumanGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHispanic or LatinoHumansLiver NeoplasmsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSoftwareAdmixtureAncestry Informative Markers (AIMs)Hepatocellular carcinomaHispanics populationSTRUCTUREWhole exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID31888480
PMCPMC6936141
OpenAlexW2996968611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.