Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31888470›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2019

Long-term impact of fecal transplantation in healthy volunteers.

Oleg V Goloshchapov, Evgenii I Olekhnovich, Sergey V Sidorenko, Ivan S Moiseev, Maxim A Kucher, Dmitry E Fedorov, Alexander V Pavlenko, Alexander I Manolov, Vladimir V Gostev, Vladimir A Veselovsky and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Association between Functional Dyspepsia and Metabolic Syndrome-The State of the Art.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Oleg V GoloshchapovR.M.Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Oncology, Hematology and Transplantation, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Evgenii I OlekhnovichFederal Research and Clinical Centre of Physical and Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation. jeniaole01@gmail.com.
Sergey V SidorenkoPediatric Research and Clinical Center for Infectious Diseases, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Ivan S MoiseevR.M.Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Oncology, Hematology and Transplantation, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Maxim A KucherR.M.Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Oncology, Hematology and Transplantation, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Dmitry E FedorovFederal Research and Clinical Centre of Physical and Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Alexander V PavlenkoFederal Research and Clinical Centre of Physical and Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Alexander I ManolovFederal Research and Clinical Centre of Physical and Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Vladimir V GostevPediatric Research and Clinical Center for Infectious Diseases, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Vladimir A VeselovskyFederal Research and Clinical Centre of Physical and Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Ksenia M KliminaFederal Research and Clinical Centre of Physical and Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Elena S KostryukovaFederal Research and Clinical Centre of Physical and Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Evgeny A BakinR.M.Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Oncology, Hematology and Transplantation, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Alexander N ShvetcovR.M.Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Oncology, Hematology and Transplantation, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Elvira D GumbatovaR.M.Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Oncology, Hematology and Transplantation, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Ruslana V KlementevaR.M.Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Oncology, Hematology and Transplantation, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Alexander A ShcherbakovR.M.Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Oncology, Hematology and Transplantation, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Margarita V GorchakovaR.M.Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Oncology, Hematology and Transplantation, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Juan José EgozcueUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Vera Pawlowsky-GlahnUniversitat de Girona, Girona, Spain.
Maria A SuvorovaExplana Research Laboratory, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Alexey B ChukhlovinR.M.Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Oncology, Hematology and Transplantation, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Vadim M GovorunFederal Research and Clinical Centre of Physical and Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Elena N IlinaFederal Research and Clinical Centre of Physical and Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Boris V AfanasyevR.M.Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Oncology, Hematology and Transplantation, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
First Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg · RUFederal Medical-Biological Agency · RUNorth-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov · RUState Research Center of the Russian Federation · RUUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya · ESUniversity of Girona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been recently approved by FDA for the treatment of refractory recurrent clostridial colitis (rCDI). Success of FTM in treatment of rCDI led to a number of studies investigating the effectiveness of its application in the other gastrointestinal diseases. However, in the majority of studies the effects of FMT were evaluated on the patients with initially altered microbiota. The aim of our study was to estimate effects of FMT on the gut microbiota composition in healthy volunteers and to monitor its long-term outcomes.

resultsWe have performed a combined analysis of three healthy volunteers before and after capsule FMT by evaluating their general condition, adverse clinical effects, changes of basic laboratory parameters, and several immune markers. Intestinal microbiota samples were evaluated by 16S rRNA gene and shotgun sequencing. The data analysis demonstrated profound shift towards the donor microbiota taxonomic composition in all volunteers. Following FMT, all the volunteers exhibited gut colonization with donor gut bacteria and persistence of this effect for almost ∼1 year of observation. Transient changes of immune parameters were consistent with suppression of T-cell cytotoxicity. FMT was well tolerated with mild gastrointestinal adverse events, however, one volunteer developed a systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

conclusionsThe FMT leads to significant long-term changes of the gut microbiota in healthy volunteers with the shift towards donor microbiota composition and represents a relatively safe procedure to the recipients without long-term adverse events.

Indexed as

Fecal Microbiota TransplantationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAdultFecesFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedRNA, Ribosomal, 16STime FactorsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA gene sequencingCompositional data analysisFecal microbiota transplantationHealthy volunteersMetagenome-assembled genomeMetagenomicsShotgun sequencing

Identifiers

PMID31888470
PMCPMC6938016
OpenAlexW2998369522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.