Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31888342›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of hospice & palliative care2020

"It's Like a Death Sentence but It Really Isn't" What Patients and Families Want to Know About Hospice Care When Making End-of-Life Decisions.

Channing E Tate, Grace Venechuk, Elinor J Brereton, Pilar Ingle, Larry A Allen, Megan A Morris, Daniel D Matlock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of hospice & palliative care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of a Novel Hospice-Specific Patient Decision Aid.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Channing E TateACCORDS, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6635-9794
Grace VenechukACCORDS, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Elinor J BreretonACCORDS, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7897-7960
Pilar IngleACCORDS, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Larry A AllenACCORDS, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Megan A MorrisACCORDS, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Daniel D MatlockACCORDS, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.

Funding

Pilot Evaluation of Hospice Decision Support ToolsR21AG059114 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MATLOCK, DANIEL D · 2018 to 2019
$437k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG059114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospice is underutilized, due to both lack of initiation from patients and late referral from clinicians. Prior research has suggested the reasons for underuse are multifactorial, including clinician and patient lack of understanding, misperceptions about the nature of hospice care, and poor communication during end-of-life discussions about hospice care. Little is known about the decisional needs of patients and families engaging in hospice decision-making.

objectivesTo understand the decisional needs of patients and families making decisions about hospice care.

methodsWe conducted focus groups with family caregivers and hospice providers and one-on-one interviews with patients considering or enrolled in hospice care. We identified participants through purposeful and snowball sampling methods. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a grounded theory approach.

resultsFour patients, 32 family caregivers, and 27 hospice providers participated in the study. Four main themes around decisional needs emerged from the interviews and focus groups: (1) What is hospice care?; (2) Why might hospice care be helpful?; (3) Where is hospice care provided?; and (4) How is hospice care paid for? DISCUSSION: Hospice may not be the right treatment choice for all with terminal illness. Our study highlights where patients' and families' understanding could be enhanced to assure that they have the opportunity to benefit from hospice, if they so desire.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversCommunicationDecision MakingEmotionsFemaleHospice CareHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedSocial SupportSocioeconomic Factorsdecision-makingend-of-lifehospicequalitative

Identifiers

PMID31888342
PMCPMC8403502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.