Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31887853›Full record

Trial reportTurkish journal of medical sciences2020

The effects of pregabalin and adductor canal block on postoperative pain in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Fatma Kavak Akelma, Ilkay Baran Akkuş, Savaş Altinsoy, Derya Özkan, Jülide Ergil

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fatma Kavak AkelmaUniversity of Health Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-3647-7516
Ilkay Baran AkkuşUniversity of Health Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-9355-5950
Savaş AltinsoyUniversity of Health Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-3588-7145
Derya ÖzkanUniversity of Health Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-8964-3015
Jülide ErgilUniversity of Health Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-4580-7866
Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: To determine the effectiveness of pregabalin and adductor canal block on opioid consumption, postoperative pain, and fast-tracking. Materials and methods: A total of 51 American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification I–II patients aged 18–70 years who were scheduled to undergo elective anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were included in the study. Patients were randomized into groups P, A, and C. Patients in group P (n = 16), received 150 mg of preoperative oral pregabalin, patients in group A (n = 17) received postoperative adductor canal blockade, and patients in group C (n = 18) received neither adductor canal block nor pregabalin. Surgeries were performed under spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine following monitorization. Demographic data along with block features, hemodynamic data, mean opioid consumption, numerical rating scale score, White’s fast-track score, and postoperative adverse effects were recorded. Results: Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in the study, and 6 patients were excluded from the study; the data of 51 patients were included in the final analyses. Demographic characteristics and hemodynamic data were similar between the 3groups. Postoperative opioid consumption was significantly lower in groups A and P compared with group C (group P = 178.75 mg, group C = 318.61 mg, group A = 236.47 mg; P < 0.05). The regression of sensory block was significantly slower in group P (P < 0.05). The first analgesic requirement was earlier in group C than in groups P and A (P < 0.05). Patients in group P had higher fast-track scores at 8 h and 12 h compared with group C (P < 0.05); however, group A fast-track scores were similar to those of the other 2groups (P > 0.05). The rate of postoperative adverse effects was similar between the groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Preoperative pregabalin (150 mg) reduced postoperative opioid consumption as much as adductor canal block in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The first analgesic requirement was earlier in group C than in groups P and A. In addition, pregabalin can prolong the duration of spinal sensory block and shorten the time required to achieve high fast-tracking scores. We recommend the use of both methods as a part of multimodal analgesia.

Indexed as

AdultAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionArthroscopyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve BlockPostoperative PainPregabalinProspective StudiesPregabalinadductor canal blockpostoperative painPregabalin

Identifiers

PMID31887853
PMCPMC7080358
OpenAlexW3001597554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.