Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31887538›Full record

ArticleVision research2020

Genetic dissection of rod and cone pathways mediating light responses and receptive fields of ganglion cells in the mouse retina.

R L Seilheimer, J Sabharwal, S M Wu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Increased Reliability of Visually-Evoked Activity in Area V1 of the MECP2-Duplication Mouse Model of Autism.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Interphotoreceptor coupling: an evolutionary perspective.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Network Architecture of Gap Junctional Coupling among Parallel Processing Channels in the Mammalian Retina.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R L SeilheimerCullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
J SabharwalCullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
S M WuCullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States. Electronic address: swu@bcm.edu.
Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

VISION RESEARCH CENTERP30EY002520 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Samuel M Wu · 1985 to 2026
$14.8M
ROD AND CONE SIGNALING PATHWAYS IN MAMMALIAN RETINAR01EY019908 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI WU, SAMUEL M · 2010 to 2020
$3.8M
VISUAL SCIENCEST32EY007001 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Samuel M Wu · 1985 to 2026
$3.7M
Educating Physician Scientists in Psychiatry (EPSP): Firing up the next generation of translational and clinical neuroscientistsR25MH119043 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Mariella De Biasi, MATTHEW S KAYSER · 2019 to 2026
$1.6M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY002520NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019908NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007001NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH119043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal ganglion cells (GCs) are important visual neurons which carry complex spatiotemporal information from the retina to higher visual centers in the brain. By taking advantage of pathway-specific knockout/mutant mice and multi-electrode array (MEA) recording techniques, we analyze contributions of rod and cone pathways to responsiveness, kinetics and receptive field profiles of GCs under scotopic and photopic conditions. Our data suggest: (1) Scotopic responses of some GCs require all three rod pathways, some require only the secondary and tertiary rod pathways, and others require only the tertiary rod pathway. (2) There are more responsive GCs in photopic conditions than responsive GCs in scotopic conditions. (3) Gap junctions slow down GCs' scotopic light responses and increase GCs' ratio of antagonistic to center inputs. (4) Cone pathways do not affect the kinetics but alter the ratio of antagonistic to center inputs of scotopic GC responses, and they speed up GCs photopic responses and alter the ratio of GCs' antagonistic to center synaptic inputs and receptive field profiles. (5) Rod bipolar cells shorten response latency of ON GCs and increase the ratio of GCs' antagonistic to center synaptic inputs. (6) Light adaptation speeds up GCs' temporal processing and tunes GC photopic responses to higher frequencies, and the tertiary rod pathway plays a significant role in adaptation-induced TTP changes in some GCs. (7) GC RF center sizes are partially mediated by AIIACs and GC-GC coupling. (8) Connexin36 gap junctions and cone pathways alter synaptic circuits underlying antagonistic surround inputs to GCs in photopic conditions.

Indexed as

LightAdaptation, OcularAnimalsColor VisionDark AdaptationMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutNight VisionReaction TimeRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRetinal Ganglion CellsRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsVisual FieldsVisual PathwaysAII amacrine cellsLight-evoked spike responsesReceptive field centerReceptive field surroundRetinal ganglion cellsSpike triggered average (STA)

Identifiers

PMID31887538
PMCPMC7264069
OpenAlexW2998650291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.