ReviewClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2021
What Multilevel Interventions Do We Need to Increase the Colorectal Cancer Screening Rate to 80%?
Review in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Multilevel factors influencing colorectal cancer screening adherence: A systematic literature review.PloS one · 2026Pooled it
- Quality measures in the delivery of equitable endoscopic care to traditionally underserved patients in the United States.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Guideline
- Race, ethnicity, and prior colorectal screening test use in CONFIRM colonoscopy vs fecal immunochemical testing trial participants.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Trial
- Trial
- A global scoping review of interventions to increase participation in screening programmes for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer between 2016 and 2025.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Colorectal cancer screening awareness among the Syrian population: A cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Effects of a telephone intervention on breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: A meta-analysis.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Review
- Improving Colorectal Screening Compliance Through Targeted Quality Improvement Interventions in Primary Care.Cureus · 2025Article
- Comparing the effectiveness of implementation strategies to improve liver and colon cancer screening for Veterans: protocol for a large cluster-randomized implementation study.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- Trends in and factors associated with family physician-performed screening colonoscopies in the United States: 2016-2021.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025Article
- Youth-to-youth empowerment study to support health equity for urban American Indian/Alaska Native and Black adolescents in Denver Metro, Colorado, USA: a mixed methods, youth-centred aetiological study protocol.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- Evaluation of population-based screening programs on colorectal cancer screening uptake and predictors in Atlantic Canada: insights from a repeated cross-sectional study.BMC global and public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Screening, awareness and challenges for colorectal cancer treatment in Saudi Arabia: an update.Bioinformation · 2024Article
- Patient preferences for the design of a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2023Article
- A "sludge audit" for health system colorectal cancer screening services.The American journal of managed care · 2023Article
- Association between the colorectal cancer screening status of primary care physicians and their patients: Evidence from the Swiss Sentinella practice-based research network.Preventive medicine reports · 2023Article
- A Community-Based Survey of Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors in Chinese Immigrants Residing in a Major Metropolitan Area.Journal of community medicine & public health · 2023Article
- Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening adherence and the impact of COVID-19 on screening patterns in Connecticut, USA.Internal and emergency medicine · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Screening reduces colorectal cancer mortality; however, this remains the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States and adherence to colorectal cancer screening falls far short of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable goal of 80%. Numerous studies have examined the effectiveness of interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening uptake. Outreach is the active dissemination of screening outside of the primary care setting, such as mailing fecal blood tests to individuals' homes. Navigation uses trained personnel to assist individuals through the screening process. Patient education may take the form of brochures, videos, or websites. Provider education can include feedback about screening rates of patient panels. Reminders to healthcare providers can be provided by dashboards of patients due for screening. Financial incentives provide monetary compensation to individuals when they complete screening tests, either as fixed payments or via a lottery. Individual preference for specific screening strategies has also been examined in several trials, with a choice of screening strategies yielding higher adherence than recommendation of a single strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.