Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31887151›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2019

Co-infection of cattle with Fasciola hepatica or F. gigantica and Mycobacterium bovis: A systematic review.

Alison K Howell, Catherine M McCann, Francesca Wickstead, Diana J L Williams

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. An insight into the epidemiology of foodborne zoonotic fascioliasis in small ruminants in northwestern region of Bangladesh.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. An investigation ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alison K HowellDepartment of Infection Biology, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1988-1376
Catherine M McCannDepartment of Infection Biology, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5388-6031
Francesca WicksteadSchool of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst, Neston, United Kingdom.
Diana J L WilliamsDepartment of Infection Biology, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
University of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The liver flukes, Fasciola hepatica and F. gigantica, are common trematode parasites of livestock. F. hepatica is known to modulate the immune response, including altering the response to co-infecting pathogens. Bovine tuberculosis (bTB), caused by Mycobacterium bovis, is a chronic disease which is difficult to control and is of both animal welfare and public health concern. Previous research has suggested that infection with liver fluke may affect the accuracy of the bTB skin test, but direction of the effect differs between studies. In a systematic review of the literature, all experimental and observational studies concerning co-infection with these two pathogens were sought. Data were extracted on the association between fluke infection and four measures of bTB diagnosis or pathology, namely, the bTB skin test, interferon γ test, lesion detection and culture/bacterial recovery. Of a large body of literature dating from 1950 to 2019, only thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. These included studies of experimentally infected calves, case control studies on adult cows, cross sectional abattoir studies and a herd level study. All the studies had a medium or high risk of bias. The balance of evidence from the 13 studies included in the review suggests that liver fluke exposure was associated with either no effect or a decreased response to all of the four aspects of bTB diagnosis assessed: skin test, IFN γ, lesion detection and mycobacteria cultured or recovered. Most studies showed a small and/or non-significant effect so the clinical and practical importance of the observed effect is likely to be modest, although it could be more significant in particular groups of animals, such as dairy cattle.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesCoinfectionCross-Sectional StudiesFasciola hepaticaFascioliasisInterferon-gamma Release TestsMycobacterium bovisObservational Studies as TopicSensitivity and SpecificityTuberculin TestTuberculosis, Bovine

Identifiers

PMID31887151
PMCPMC6936813
OpenAlexW2997386527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.