Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31887122›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Perceptions and practices related to birthweight in rural Bangladesh: Implications for neonatal health programs in low- and middle-income settings.

Monjura Khatun Nisha, Camille Raynes-Greenow, Aminur Rahman, Ashraful Alam

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. U-Shaped Association between Maternal Hemoglobin and Low Birth Weight in Rural Bangladesh.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Monjura Khatun NishaSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9999-4476
Camille Raynes-GreenowSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Aminur RahmanHealth Systems and Population Studies Division, icddr,b, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-1434-3883
Ashraful AlamSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, low birthweight (LBW) infants (<2.5 kilograms) contribute up to 80% of neonatal mortality. In Bangladesh, approximately 62% of all births occur at home and therefore, weighing newborns immediately after birth is not feasible. Thus, estimates of birthweight in Bangladesh are mostly obtained based on maternal perception of the newborn's birth size. Little is known about how birthweight is perceived in rural communities, and whether families associate birthweight with newborn's health status. Our objective was to explore families' perceptions of newborn's birthweight, and preventive and care practices for a LBW newborn in rural Bangladesh.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study in two rural settings of Bangladesh, including 32 in-depth interviews (11 with pregnant women, 12 with recently delivered women, 4 with husbands whose wives were pregnant or had a recent birth, 5 with mothers-in-law whose daughters-in-law were pregnant or had a recent birth), 2 focus group discussions with husbands and 4 key-informant interviews with community health workers. We used thematic analysis to analyse the data.

resultsMost participants did not consider birthweight a priority for assessing a newborn's health status, although there was a desire for a healthy newborn. Recognition of different categories of birthweight was subjective and often included several physical descriptors including birth size of the newborn. LBW was not considered as a criterion of a newborn's illness unless the newborn appeared unwell. Maternal poor nutrition, inadequate diet in pregnancy, anaemia, illness during pregnancy, short stature, twin births and influence of supernatural spirit were identified as the major causes of LBW. Women's preventive practices for LBW or small newborns were predominantly constrained by a lack of awareness of birthweight and fear of caesarean section. As an effort to avoid caesarean section during birth, several women tended to perform potentially harmful practices in order to give birth to a small size newborn; such as avoiding nutritious food and eating less in pregnancy. Common practices to treat a LBW or small newborn who appeared ill included breastfeeding, feeding animal milk, feeding sugary water, feeding formula, oil massage, keeping the small newborn warm and seeking care from formal and informal care providers including a spiritual leader. Maternal lack of decision-making power, financial constraint, home birth and superstition were the major challenges to caring for a LBW newborn.

conclusionBirthweight was not well-understood in the rural community, which highlighted substantial challenges to the prevention and care practices of LBW newborns. Community-level health education is needed to promote awareness related to the recognition of birthweight in rural settings.

Indexed as

AdultBangladeshBirth WeightCesarean SectionFemaleHome ChildbirthHumansIncomeInfantInfant HealthInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornMothersParturitionPatient Acceptance of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID31887122
PMCPMC6936797
OpenAlexW2997136878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.