Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31886768›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

Estimating effectiveness of case-area targeted response interventions against cholera in Haiti.

Edwige Michel, Jean Gaudart, Samuel Beaulieu, Gregory Bulit, Martine Piarroux, Jacques Boncy, Patrick Dely, Renaud Piarroux, Stanislas Rebaudet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Epidemicity conditions in spatial models of infectious diseases.Bollettino della Unione matematica italiana (2008) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Outbreak ofEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2024
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Implementation of targeted cholera response activities, Cameroon.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2023
    Article
  15. Frontiers in medicine · 2023
    Review
  16. Vibrio Infections and the Twenty-First Century.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Edwige MichelMinistry of Public Health and Population, Directorate of Epidemiology Laboratory and Research, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Jean GaudartAix-Marseille Université, APHM, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Hop Timone, BiSTIC, Biostatistics and ICT, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9006-5729
Samuel BeaulieuUnited Nations Children's Fund, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Gregory BulitUnited Nations Children's Fund, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Martine PiarrouxCentre d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique des Armées, Service de Santé des Armées, Marseille, France.
Jacques BoncyMinistry of Public Health and Population, National Laboratory of Public Health, Delmas, Haiti.
Patrick DelyMinistry of Public Health and Population, Directorate of Epidemiology Laboratory and Research, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Renaud PiarrouxSorbonne Université, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre-Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP), AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Stanislas RebaudetAPHM, Hôpital Européen, Aix Marseille Université, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, IPLESP, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5099-1947

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Case-area targeted interventions (CATIs) against cholera are conducted by rapid response teams, and may include various activities like water, sanitation, hygiene measures. However, their real-world effectiveness has never been established. We conducted a retrospective observational study in 2015-2017 in the Centre department of Haiti. Using cholera cases, stool cultures and CATI records, we identified 238 outbreaks that were responded to. After adjusting for potential confounders, we found that a prompt response could reduce the number of accumulated cases by 76% (95% confidence interval, 59 to 86) and the outbreak duration by 61% (41 to 75) when compared to a delayed response. An intense response could reduce the number of accumulated cases by 59% (11 to 81) and the outbreak duration by 73% (49 to 86) when compared to a weaker response. These results suggest that prompt and repeated CATIs were significantly effective at mitigating and shortening cholera outbreaks in Haiti.

Indexed as

Water MicrobiologyCholeraDisease OutbreaksHaitiHumansHygieneSanitationWaterWatercase-area targeted interventioncholeradisease outbreaks/prevention & controlepidemiologyglobal healthHaitiimpact assessmentrapid response team

Identifiers

PMID31886768
PMCPMC7041943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.