Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31886756›Full record

ReviewCurrent radiopharmaceuticals2020

Vittorio Briganti, Vincenzo Cuccurullo, Valentina Berti, Giuseppe D Di Stasio, Flavia Linguanti, Francesco Mungai, Luigi Mansi

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current radiopharmaceuticals, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Breast Imaging Physics in Mammography (Part I).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  4. A Systematic Review on Combined [Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  5. Radiomics in Breast Imaging: Future Development.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vittorio BrigantiNuclear Medicine Unit, AOUC Firenze, Italy.
Vincenzo CuccurulloNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Precision Medicine - Università della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Valentina BertiNuclear Medicine Unit, AOUC Firenze, Italy.
Giuseppe D Di StasioNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Precision Medicine - Università della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Flavia LinguantiNuclear Medicine Unit, AOUC Firenze, Italy.
Francesco MungaiRadiology Unit, AOUC Firenze, Italy.
Luigi MansiSection Health and Development, Interuniversity Research Center for Sustainability (CIRPS), Napoli, Italy.
University of Florence · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITCentro Interuniversitario di Ricerca Per lo Sviluppo sostenibile · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) consist of a relatively rare spectrum of malignancies that can arise from neuroendocrine cells; lung NETs (L-NETs) represent about 25% of primary lung neoplasm and 10% of all carcinoid tumors. Diagnostic algorithm usually takes into consideration chest Xray, contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. Nuclear medicine plays a crucial role in the detection and correct assessment of neoplastic functional status as it provides in vivo metabolic data related to the overexpression of Somatostatin Receptors (SSTRs) and also predicting response to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). 111In-Pentreotide (Octreoscan®) is commercially available for imaging of neuroendocrine tumors, their metastases and the management of patients with NETs. More recently, 99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC(Tektrotyd®) was introduced into the market and its use has been approved for imaging of patients with L-NETs and other SSTR-positive tumors. 99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC could also represent a good alternative to 68Ga-DOTA-peptides (DOTA-TOC, DOTA-NOC, DOTATATE) in hospitals or centers where PET/CT or 68Ge/68Ga generators are not available. When compared to 111In-Pentetreotide, Tektrotyd® showed slightly higher sensitivity, in the presence of higher imaging quality and lower radiation exposure for patients. Interesting perspectives depending on the kinetic analysis allowed by Tektrotyd® may be obtained in differential diagnosis of non-small cells lung cancer (NSCLC) versus small cells lung cancer (SCLC) and NETs. An interesting perspective could be also associated with a surgery radio-guided by Tektrotyd® in operable lung tumors, including either NETs and NSCLC.

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyCarcinoid TumorHumansImage EnhancementLung DiseasesLung NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsOctreotideOrganometallic CompoundsOrganotechnetium CompoundsRadiopharmaceuticalsSomatostatin99mTc-octreotideGa(III)-DOTATOCOctreotideOrganometallic CompoundsOrganotechnetium CompoundspentetreotideRadiopharmaceuticalsSomatostatin99mTc-EDDA/HYNICTOCdiagnostic imaginglungNeuroendocrine tumorsnuclear medicinePET/CTsomatostatin

Identifiers

PMID31886756
PMCPMC8193811
OpenAlexW2996798470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.