Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31886687›Full record

SynthesisPsychological bulletin2020

Aftereffects and deactivation of completed prospective memory intentions: A systematic review.

Marcus Möschl, Rico Fischer, Julie M Bugg, Michael K Scullin, Thomas Goschke, Moritz Walser

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychological bulletin, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The influence of intentions on dream content.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Meta-control: From psychology to computational neuroscience.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marcus MöschlDepartment of Psychology.
Rico FischerDepartment of Psychology.
Julie M BuggDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences.
Michael K ScullinDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience.
Thomas GoschkeDepartment of Psychology.
Moritz WalserDepartment of Psychology.

Funding

Using Smartphone Personal Assistant Technology to Improve Prospective Memory in Alzheimer's DiseaseR21AG053161 · NIA · BAYLOR UNIVERSITY · PI SCULLIN, MICHAEL K · 2017 to 2018
$397k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG053161NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prospective memory, the ability to perform an intended action in the future, is an essential aspect of goal-directed behavior. Intentions influence our behavior and shape the way we process and interact with our environment. One important question for research on prospective memory and goal-directed behavior is whether this influence stops after the intention has been completed successfully. Are intention representations deactivated from memory after their completion, and if so, how? Here, we systematically review 20 years of research on intention deactivation and so-called aftereffects of completed intentions across different research fields to offer an integrative perspective on this topic. We first introduce the currently dominant accounts of aftereffects (inhibition vs. retrieval) and illustrate the paradigms, findings, and interpretations that these accounts developed from. We then review the evidence for each account based on the extant research in these paradigms. While early studies proposed a rapid deactivation or even inhibition of completed intentions, more recent studies mostly suggested that intentions continue to be retrieved even after completion and interfere with subsequent performance. Although these accounts of aftereffects seem mutually exclusive, we will show that they might be two sides of the same coin. That is, intention deactivation and the occurrence of aftereffects are modulated by a multitude of factors that either foster a rapid deactivation or lead to continued retrieval of completed intentions. Lastly, we outline future directions and novel experimental procedures for research on mechanisms and modulators of intention deactivation and discuss practical implications of our findings. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalIntentionMemory, EpisodicHumansMental Recall

Identifiers

PMID31886687
PMCPMC7007322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.