ArticleJournal of cellular biochemistry2021
Retraction.
Article in Journal of cellular biochemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2019-12-30Concerns/Issues about Data · Date of Article and/or Notice Unknown · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retraction: 'Circular RNA circMTO1 acts as an antitumor factor in rectal cancer cell lines by downregulation of miR-19b-3p', by Mingfeng Fan, Yueqing Wang, Shubo Gao, J Cell Biochem. The above article, published online on 30 December 2019 on Wiley Online Library, has been retracted by agreement between the authors, the journal's Editor in Chief, Prof. Dr. Christian Behl, and Wiley Periodicals LLC. The authors asked to retract this manuscript and stated that not all co-authors agreed on the publication, initially, but were not available for further comments during the investigation. The retraction has been agreed following an investigation based on allegations raised by a third party. The authors stated that not all co-authors agree on the publication. Raw data could not be provided and thus the overall validity of the results could not be confirmed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.