ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2021
Facilitators of peer coaching/support engagement and dissemination among women at risk for and surviving with breast cancer.
Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic education and peer support among Ashkenazi Jewish women in the United States at risk for and surviving with breast cancer.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Peer support programming among women at-risk for or surviving breast cancer: Facilitators and barriers to community-based patient navigation.Translational behavioral medicine · 2025Article
- Addressing the rising colorectal cancer burden in the older adult: examining modifiable risk and protective factors for comprehensive prevention strategies.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Patient Navigation in Mothers at Risk for and Surviving with Breast/Ovarian Cancer: The Role of Children's Ages in Program Utilization and Health Outcomes.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Effect of shared decision-making in patients with breast cancer undergoing breast reconstruction surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2024Review
- Impact of a resilience-building energy management intervention for people with systemic sclerosis: a mixed methods study.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2024Article
- The Transformation of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncological and Supportive Care in Canada: A Mixed Methods Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- Can Social Media Be Used as a Community-Building and Support Tool among Jewish Women Impacted by Breast and Ovarian Cancer? An Evidence-Based Observational Report.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The Role of Peer Support and Patient Navigation for Empowerment in Breast Cancer Survivors: Implications for Community Cancer Control.Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One-on-one peer coaching/support programs hold promise in promoting healthy outcomes among women at risk for and surviving with breast cancer, with the potential to bridge gaps in "whole person care." Although popularly cited for their benefits, emerging evidence is mixed and suggests that peer support program impacts may be attenuated by individual- and community-specific factors. We evaluated a national not-for-profit breast cancer organization's peer support program outcomes (2015-2018) serving women from predominantly Jewish backgrounds to examine program engagement, facilitation, and satisfaction. Of the N = 392 women sampled, 37% utilized the peer support program: the majority were referred by a family member/friend (40%) or had connected with the program online (34%). Logistic regression modeling revealed that mothers (odds ratio [OR] = 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.04 to 3.19), women at increased genetic risk for breast cancer (OR = 2.07; 95% CI = 1.08 to 3.94), and those who connected with the organization through a family member/friend (OR = 1.97; 95% CI = 1.23 to 3.15) were significantly more likely to utilize peer support (all p's < .05). Satisfaction with peer support was high and reliably measured (M = 42.8 out of possible 50; α = .95). These findings emphasize opportunities for peer support programs to serve a range of needs among breast cancer previvors and survivors and increase health care's organizational capacity to reach and impact this community through trusted and well-trained lay coaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.