Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31886471›Full record

ArticleIEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing. IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud, and Grid Computing2019

Volumetric Segmentation

Brendan Sullivan, Patricia S Langan, Rick Archibald, Leighton Coates, Venu Gopal Vadavasi, Vickie Lynch

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing. IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud, and Grid Computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Harvesting Microscopy Experimental Context with a Configurable Laboratory Information Management System.Microscopy and microanalysis : the official journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brendan SullivanNeutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Patricia S LanganNeutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Rick ArchibaldComputer Science and Mathematics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Leighton CoatesNeutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Venu Gopal VadavasiNeutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Vickie LynchNeutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory · US

Funding

Computational Tools for Neutron Protein CrystallographyR01GM071939 · NIGMS · UT-BATTELLE, LLC-OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LAB · PI COATES, LEIGHTON · 2004 to 2019
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crystallography is the powerhouse technique for molecular structure determination, with applications in fields ranging from energy storage to drug design. Accurate structure determination, however, relies partly on determining the precise locations and integrated intensities of Bragg peaks in the resulting data. Here, we describe a method for Bragg peak integration that is accomplished using neural networks. The network is based on a U-Net and identifies peaks in three-dimensional reciprocal space through segmentation, allowing prediction of the full 3D peak shape from noisy data that is commonly difficult to process. The procedure for generating appropriate training sets is detailed. Trained networks achieve Dice coefficients of 0.82 and mean IoUs of 0.69. Carrying out integration over entire datasets, it is demonstrated that integrating neural network-predicted peaks results in improved intensity statistics. Furthermore, using a second dataset, the possibility of transfer learning between datasets is shown. Given the ubiquity and growing complexity of crystallography, we anticipate integration by machine learning to play an increasingly important role across the physical sciences. These early results demonstrate the applicability of deep learning techniques for integrating crystallography data and suggest a possible role in the next generation of crystallography experiments.

Indexed as

crystallographyneural networksneutronsvolume segmentation

Identifiers

PMID31886471
PMCPMC6934264
OpenAlexW2954556895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.