ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2019
Threshold variation of transcranial motor evoked potential with threshold criterion in frontotemporal craniotomy.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Energy-dependent cortical injury thresholds in high-frequency transcortical electrical stimulation: a biophysical study in a rat model.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- Parent Artery Occlusion for a Giant Serpentine Aneurysm of the Internal Carotid Artery under Electrophysiological Monitoring: A Case Report.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2026Article
- Utility of evoked potentials during anterior cerebral artery and anterior communicating artery aneurysm clipping.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMotor threshold usually varies in the intraoperative motor evoked potential (MEP) by transcranial evoked stimulation (TES). This study investigated the degree of change in the motor threshold before and after surgery in TES-MEP monitoring with threshold criterion. This study aimed to evaluate the threshold change and discuss the factors influencing the motor threshold.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed TES-MEP monitoring during supratentorial surgery with frontotemporal craniotomy in 72 patients without pre- and postoperative motor weakness. We analyzed the percentage changes between the affected and the unaffected sides, correlating the changes on the two sides.
resultsThe percentage change on the affected and the unaffected side was 4.4 ± 15.1% and 0.4 ± 6.5%, respectively. The percentage change on the affected side was significantly larger than that on the unaffected side. A significantly positive correlation between the percentage change on the affected and the unaffected sides was detected.
conclusionThe threshold for the TES-MEP varied significantly more than that on the unaffected side. SIGNIFICANCE: It is important to understand the characteristics of threshold variation for the evaluation of TES-MEP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.