ArticleExpert review of precision medicine and drug development2018
Immunotherapy and next-generation sequencing guided therapy for precision oncology: What have we learnt and what does the future hold?
Article in Expert review of precision medicine and drug development, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pathogen to read: a rapid, automated workflow for public health-ready microbial sequencing.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Systems Biology Approaches for the Improvement of Oncolytic Virus-Based Immunotherapies.Cancers · 2023Review
- Benchmarking of 5 algorithms for high-resolution genotyping of human leukocyte antigen class I genes from blood and tissue samples.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Neoantigen: A New Breakthrough in Tumor Immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Circulating Tumor DNA Testing Overcomes Limitations of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling from Tumor Tissue.Case reports in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe rapid development of clinical next generation sequencing (NGS) and the contemporaneous availability of molecular targeted therapies ignited and fueled the field of precision oncology. More recently there has been an explosion of immunotherapeutic agents, specifically the checkpoint inhibitors: PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 antibodies. These new classes of agents have produced durable responses in a variety of tumor subtypes. AREAS COVERED: In this review, the authors explore the role of NGS in identifying targets for molecular therapy. The authors also expand on the future uses of NGS in oncology including: prediction of checkpoint inhibitor response, quantification of tumor mutational burden, neoantigen calling using bioinformatics tools, and finally the personalization of cell transfer technologies and cancer vaccines. EXPERT COMMENTARY: The near future will witness an increased understanding of the immune system and genomics in cancer. High throughput sequencing technology will expand in parallel with an ever-expanding array of novel therapies. Improved computational power coupled with bioinformatics algorithms will combine the fields of genomics and immunology. The emerging fields that stand to benefit from rapid translation of NGS technology include cancer vaccines and adoptive cell therapy, which will further refine precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.