Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31886306›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology research2019

Preoperative Risk Assessment of Lymph Node Metastasis in cT1 Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study from Eastern China.

Chengyan Zhang, Guanchao Pang, Chengxi Ma, Jingni Wu, Pingli Wang, Kai Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chengyan ZhangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310009 Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1281-8083
Guanchao PangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310009 Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1742-7839
Chengxi MaDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310009 Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5569-2687
Jingni WuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310009 Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6889-5558
Pingli WangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310009 Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1472-1242
Kai WangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310009 Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4328-8799
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLymph node status of clinical T1 (diameter ≤ 3 cm) lung cancer largely affects the treatment strategies in the clinic. In order to assess lymph node status before operation, we aim to develop a noninvasive predictive model using preoperative clinical information.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 924 patients (development group) and 380 patients (validation group) of clinical T1 lung cancer. Univariate analysis followed by polytomous logistic regression was performed to estimate different risk factors of lymph node metastasis between N1 and N2 diseases. A predictive model of N2 metastasis was established with dichotomous logistic regression, externally validated and compared with previous models.

resultsConsolidation size and clinical N stage based on CT were two common independent risk factors for both N1 and N2 metastases, with different odds ratios. For N2 metastasis, we identified five independent predictors by dichotomous logistic regression: peripheral location, larger consolidation size, lymph node enlargement on CT, no smoking history, and higher levels of serum CEA. The model showed good calibration and discrimination ability in the development data, with the reasonable Hosmer-Lemeshow test (

conclusionIn this study, we analyzed risk factors for both N1 and N2 metastases and built a predictive model to evaluate possibilities of N2 metastasis of clinical T1 lung cancers before the surgery. Our model will help to select patients with low probability of N2 metastasis and assist in clinical decision to further management.

Indexed as

Preoperative PeriodAgedFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOdds RatioPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPublic Health SurveillanceRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID31886306
PMCPMC6914921
OpenAlexW2989774103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.