ArticleBioMed research international2019
Validation of MR-Based Attenuation Correction of a Newly Released Whole-Body Simultaneous PET/MR System.
Article in BioMed research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toward an optimized PET reconstruction protocol for spinal cord: superiority of OSEM with TOF and PSF.EJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Respiratory motion-corrected quiescent period gating magnetic resonance attenuation correction (Q.MRAC) for enhancing quantitative accuracy in hepatic [18F]FDG PET/MRI: a dual-domain motion compensation study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- TSPO PET/MR in neuropsychiatric lupus: neuroinflammatory metabolic signatures and diagnostic biomarkers.Lupus science & medicine · 2025Article
- MultiparametricLa Radiologia medica · 2025Article
- Prediction of non-small cell lung cancer subtypes is possible through restricted spectrum imaging.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and stretch-exponential model DWI basedCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Article
- The added value ofAbdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Article
- Sensitivity and specificity of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging for assessing programmed death-ligand 1 status in non-small cell lung cancer: a comparative study with intravoxel incoherent motion andQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Clinical advances in PET-MRI for breast cancer.The Lancet. Oncology · 2022Review
- The impact of MR-based attenuation correction in spinal cord FDG-PET/MR imaging for neurological studies.Medical physics · 2021Article
- NEMA NU2-2012 performance measurements of the United Imaging uPMR790: an integrated PET/MR system.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
- Evaluation of SUVlean consistency in FDG and PSMA PET/MR with Dixon-, James-, and Janma-based lean body mass correction.EJNMMI physics · 2021Article
- Attenuation correction for human PET/MRI studies.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Article
- Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging advances in the 21st century.The British journal of radiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to validate quantitative performance of a newly released simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner, by using MR-based attenuation correction (MRAC), both in phantom study and in patient study. PET/MRI image uniformities of a phantom under different hardware configurations were tested and compared. Thirty patients were examined with 2-deoxy-2-[
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.