Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31886216›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2019

The Efficacy of Cognitive Training for Elderly Chinese Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Zhenren Peng, Hu Jiang, Xiaomin Wang, Kaiyong Huang, Yukun Zuo, Xiangmin Wu, Abu S Abdullah, Li Yang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Clinical Effectiveness of Treatments for Mild Cognitive Impairment in Adults: A Systematic Review.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhenren PengDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China.
Hu JiangDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China.
Xiaomin WangDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China.
Kaiyong HuangDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8206-7513
Yukun ZuoDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China.
Xiangmin WuDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China.
Abu S AbdullahGlobal Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan 215316, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9841-0344
Li YangDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6663-4629

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The age of the population is shifting toward the elderly range, which may lead to an increased risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The aims of this study are to evaluate the cognitive function in elderly people using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), to identify the relationship between cognitive function and different characteristics, and to evaluate the efficacy of the intervention after six months of cognitive training. In this study, we included 2886 subjects aged ≧60 years in the baseline survey, and 140 subjects with MCI who participated in the baseline survey were randomly divided into an intervention group (

Indexed as

CognitionCognitive Behavioral TherapyCognitive DysfunctionDementiaExercise TherapyAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID31886216
PMCPMC6907055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.