Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31886174›Full record

SynthesisBioMed research international2019

Is Remnant Preservation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Superior to the Standard Technique? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Han Wang, Ziming Liu, Yuwan Li, Yihang Peng, Wei Xu, Ning Hu, Wei Huang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Remnant preservation may improve proprioception after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The importance of continuous remnant preservation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Graft healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Han WangDepartment of Joint Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Ziming LiuInstitute of Sports Medicine Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yuwan LiDepartment of Joint Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yihang PengFirst College of Clinical Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Wei XuDepartment of Joint Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Ning HuDepartment of Joint Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Wei HuangDepartment of Joint Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7231-2826

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis is a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence that aims at comparing the clinical outcomes of remnant-preserving anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and standard ACLR.

methodsA systematic review of randomized controlled studies and cohort studies comparing remnant-preserving ACLR with standard ACLR with a minimum level of evidence of II was performed. Studies were included by strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Extracted data were summarized as preoperative conditions, postoperative clinical outcomes, and postoperative complications. When feasible, meta-analysis was performed with RevMan5.3 software. Study methodological quality was evaluated with the modified Coleman methodology score (CMS).

resultsEleven studies ( SUMMARY/

conclusionRemnant-preserving ACLR promotes similar graft synovial coverage and revascularization to standard ACLR. Equivalent or superior postoperative knee stability and clinical scores were observed for remnant-preserving ACLR compared with standard ACLR. No significant difference in the total complication rate between the groups was evident.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyAnterior Cruciate LigamentAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionHumansKnee JointTibiaTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31886174
PMCPMC6927015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.