Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31885978›Full record

ArticleCase reports in ophthalmological medicine2019

Rhino-Orbito-Cerebral Mucormycosis: Two Cases with Amaurosis as Presentation, Medical Surgical Management and Follow-Up.

Carmen Navarro-Perea, Ignacio Cañas-Zamarra, Enrique Mencía-Gutiérrez, Enrique Revilla-Sánchez, María-Dolores Lago-Llinás, Silvia Pérez-Trigo, Álvaro Bengoa-González

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in ophthalmological medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Restoring Quality of Life: Assessing the Impact of Free Flap Reconstruction in Coronavirus Disease 2019-Associated Rhino-Orbital Mucormycosis Patients.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carmen Navarro-PereaOphthalmology Department, 12 de Octubre Hospital, Complutense University, 28041 Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4080-4436
Ignacio Cañas-ZamarraOphthalmology Department, 12 de Octubre Hospital, Complutense University, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
Enrique Mencía-GutiérrezOphthalmology Department, 12 de Octubre Hospital, Complutense University, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
Enrique Revilla-SánchezPathology Department, 12 de Octubre Hospital, Complutense University, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
María-Dolores Lago-LlinásOphthalmology Department, 12 de Octubre Hospital, Complutense University, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
Silvia Pérez-TrigoOphthalmology Department, 12 de Octubre Hospital, Complutense University, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
Álvaro Bengoa-GonzálezOphthalmology Department, 12 de Octubre Hospital, Complutense University, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID31885978
PMCPMC6915154
OpenAlexW2993417811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.