ArticleF1000Research2019
Comparison of human population receptive field estimates between scanners and the effect of temporal filtering.
Article in F1000Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Layer-specific changes in sensory cortex across the lifespan in mice and humans.Nature neuroscience · 2025Article
- Perceiving object size in pictures involves high-level processing.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Biases in Volumetric Versus Surface Analyses in Population Receptive Field Mapping.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- NOise Reduction with DIstribution Corrected (NORDIC) principal component analysis improves brain activity detection across rodent and human functional MRI contexts.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Retinotopic connectivity maps of human visual cortex with unconstrained eye movements.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- A selection and targeting framework of cortical locations for line-scanning fMRI.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Comparing retinotopic maps of children and adults reveals a late-stage change in how V1 samples the visual field.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Cortical field maps across human sensory cortex.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023Review
- Highly accurate retinotopic maps of the physiological blind spot in human visual cortex.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Pitfalls in post hoc analyses of population receptive field data.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Simultaneous changes in visual acuity, cortical population receptive field size, visual field map size, and retinal thickness in healthy human aging.Brain structure & function · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.