ReviewF1000Research2019
Recent advances in understanding multiple sclerosis.
Review in F1000Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of angiotensin converting enzyme type 2 serum level and gene polymorphisms with multiple sclerosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Proteomic Characterization of Spinal Cord Myelin in the Mouse.ASN neuro · 2026Article
- Altered Lipid Metabolism in CNS Demyelination and Remyelination Are Key Elements Driving Progressive MS.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Assessing the level of awareness and knowledge regarding multiple sclerosis among the Saudi community of the Al-Ahsa region.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Patient iPSC models reveal glia-intrinsic phenotypes in multiple sclerosis.Cell stem cell · 2024Article
- Alterations of Oligodendrocyte and Myelin Energy Metabolism in Multiple Sclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Role of Microglial Cells in the Pathophysiology of MS: Synergistic or Antagonistic?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Ocrevus reduces TH40 cells, a biomarker of systemic inflammation, in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) and in progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS).Journal of neuroimmunology · 2023Article
- Understanding polyomavirus CNS disease - a perspective from mouse models.The FEBS journal · 2022Review
- The Forgotten Brother: The Innate-like B1 Cell in Multiple Sclerosis.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Validity and reliability of Persian version of the Arm Function in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2022Article
- Medicinal herbs and multiple sclerosis: Overview on the hard balance between new therapeutic strategy and occupational health risk.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022Review
- What do we know about the role of lncRNAs in multiple sclerosis?Neural regeneration research · 2021Review
- Cerebrospinal fluid proteome shows disrupted neuronal development in multiple sclerosis.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- NK Cells in Autoimmune Diseases: Protective or Pathogenic?Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Engine Failure in Axo-Myelinic Signaling: A Potential Key Player in the Pathogenesis of Multiple Sclerosis.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021Review
- Prostaglandin D2 signaling in dendritic cells is critical for the development of EAE.Journal of autoimmunity · 2020Article
- Current Methods of Magnetic Resonance for Noninvasive Assessment of Molecular Aspects of Pathoetiology in Multiple Sclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Promising Nanotechnology Approaches in Treatment of Autoimmune Diseases of Central Nervous System.Brain sciences · 2020Review
- Revisiting the Pathoetiology of Multiple Sclerosis: Has the Tail Been Wagging the Mouse?Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emerging data point to important contributions of both autoimmune inflammation and progressive degeneration in the pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis (MS). Unfortunately, after decades of intensive investigation, the fundamental cause remains unknown. A large body of research on the immunobiology of MS has resulted in a variety of anti-inflammatory therapies that are highly effective at reducing brain inflammation and clinical/radiological relapses. However, despite potent suppression of inflammation, benefit in the more important and disabling progressive phase is extremely limited; thus, progressive MS has emerged as the greatest challenge for the MS research and clinical communities. Data obtained over the years point to a complex interplay between environment (e.g., the near-absolute requirement of Epstein-Barr virus exposure), immunogenetics (strong associations with a large number of immune genes), and an ever more convincing role of an underlying degenerative process resulting in demyelination (in both white and grey matter regions), axonal and neuro-synaptic injury, and a persistent innate inflammatory response with a seemingly diminishing role of T cell-mediated autoimmunity as the disease progresses. Together, these observations point toward a primary degenerative process, one whose cause remains unknown but one that entrains a nearly ubiquitous secondary autoimmune response, as a likely sequence of events underpinning this disease. Here, we briefly review what is known about the potential pathophysiological mechanisms, focus on progressive MS, and discuss the two main hypotheses of MS pathogenesis that are the topic of vigorous debate in the field: whether primary autoimmunity or degeneration lies at the foundation. Unravelling this controversy will be critically important for developing effective new therapies for the most disabling later phases of this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.