Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31885835›Full record

ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2020

Optimising IBD patient selection for de-escalation of anti-TNF therapy to immunomodulator maintenance.

Rachael Swann, Alan Boal, Seth Ian Squires, Carly Lamb, Laura Louise Clark, Selina Lamont, Graham Naismith

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachael SwannDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Division, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3945-2253
Alan BoalDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Division, Glasgow, UK.
Seth Ian SquiresDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Division, Glasgow, UK.
Carly LambDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Division, Glasgow, UK.
Laura Louise ClarkDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Division, Glasgow, UK.
Selina LamontDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Division, Glasgow, UK.
Graham NaismithDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Division, Glasgow, UK.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasingly managed with the use of biologic therapies. National guidelines (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)) suggest considering cessation after 1 year of therapy but lack detailed criteria for this. We aimed to describe clinical outcomes from the introduction of a biologic review panel (BRP) to implement modified criteria for cessation of antitumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy and step down to single-agent immunomodulator.

designRetrospective review of patient outcomes following BRP implementation. PATIENTS: All patients on biologic therapy discussed in the BRP within a 5-year period.

settingSingle IBD network covering three hospital sites.

interventionsModified criteria for biologic cessation were based on published evidence; they excluded individuals with no suitable maintenance immunomodulator, previous surgery or evidence of active disease, additional indications for anti-TNF therapy and previous relapse on biologic cessation. All patients with IBD on a biologic were discussed at the BRP.

main outcome measuresRelapse following IBD cessation and relative cost of BRP.

results136 patients with IBD were reviewed, with 45 patients meeting the NICE guideline criteria for cessation. The BRP and modified criteria affected decision to withdraw therapy in 38% of these. Therapy was withdrawn in 27 patients, with a 20% 24-month relapse rate. Younger age at cessation was significantly associated with relapse (p=0.01).

conclusionThe BRP approach has proved a safe and effective means of decision making in stopping biologic therapy. Future work to inform exclusion criteria is required.

Indexed as

biologic therapyhealth economicsinflammatory bowel disease

Identifiers

PMID31885835
PMCPMC6914296
OpenAlexW2943728055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.